A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Incremental yield in sputum smear positivity by examining a second early morning sputum specimen in follow-up patients on DOTS: 7 year analysis of RNTCP laboratory register. | LitMetric

Background: Patients receiving DOTS undergo periodic follow-up sputum examination, which aids in monitoring response to treatment. Continued or new smear positivity at follow up examination entails extension of intensive phase or change in treatment category and the need for culture and drug susceptibility test.

Setting: Tuberculosis microscopy centre at a tertiary care teaching hospital, Mumbai, India.

Objective: To determine the incremental yield in sputum smear positivity by examining a second early morning sputum specimen in follow-up patients on DOTS.

Design: Retrospective analysis of follow up sputum microscopy results recorded in tuberculosis laboratory register for the period 2002-2008.

Results: During the study period, 5015 follow-up patients submitted two early morning sputum specimens, of which 501(9.99%) patients were detected to be smear-positive. Out of smear positive patients under study, 324 patients had both specimens positive, 79 patients had only first specimen positive and 98 patients had only second specimen positive. The incremental yield was 1.95% of total and 19.5% of smear positives.

Conclusion: Discordant smears were present in nearly a third of patients detected smear positive during follow-up. More than half of these patients were detected only by examining second specimen. The incremental yield by examining the second early morning specimen was 1.95% of total and 19.5% of smear positive specimens. It is important to detect each possible smear positive follow-up patient as they are likely to benefit from altered treatment. The inclusion of a second early morning sputum specimen examination is essential to maximize their detection.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

early morning
20
incremental yield
16
examining second
16
second early
16
morning sputum
16
smear positive
16
smear positivity
12
sputum specimen
12
follow-up patients
12
patients detected
12

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!