A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

2D/3D image fusion of X-ray mammograms with breast MRI: visualizing dynamic contrast enhancement in mammograms. | LitMetric

2D/3D image fusion of X-ray mammograms with breast MRI: visualizing dynamic contrast enhancement in mammograms.

Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg

Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute for Data Processing and Electronics, Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1, 76344, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Karlsruhe, Germany.

Published: May 2012

Purpose: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women. The established screening method to detect breast cancer is X-ray mammography. Additionally, MRI is used for diagnosis in clinical routine. Due to complementary diagnostic information, both modalities are often read in combination. Yet, the correlation is challenging due to different dimensionality of images and different patient positioning. In this paper, we describe a method to fuse X-ray mammograms with DCE-MRI. The present study was conducted to evaluate the feasibility of the approach.

Methods: For the combination of information from both modalities, the images have to be registered using a compression simulation based on a patient-specific biomechanical model. The registered images can be compared directly. The contrast enhancement in the DCE-MRI volume is evaluated using parametric enhancement maps. A projection image of the contrast enhancement is created. The image fusion combines it with X-ray mammograms for intuitive multimodal diagnosis.

Results: The image fusion was evaluated using 11 clinical datasets. For 10 of 11 datasets, a good accuracy of the image registration was achieved. The overlap of contrast-enhanced regions with marked lesions in the mammogram is 61%. Lesions are clearly differentiable from surrounding tissue by the DCE-MRI projection in 10 of 11 cases.

Conclusion: The described preliminary results are promising, thus we expect the visualization of quantitative information from dynamic MRI together with mammograms to be beneficial for multimodal diagnosis. Because of the use of clinical standard modalities, no additional image acquisition is needed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-011-0623-zDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

image fusion
12
x-ray mammograms
12
contrast enhancement
12
breast cancer
8
diagnosis clinical
8
mammograms
5
image
5
2d/3d image
4
x-ray
4
fusion x-ray
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!