AI Article Synopsis

  • The study examines the effect of interruptions during anesthesia induction, highlighting how unrelated questions from other personnel can distract certified registered nurse anesthetists (CRNAs) and potentially lead to errors.
  • An analysis of 8 CRNAs revealed an average of 7.5 interruptions every 9 minutes, translating to about 68 interruptions per hour, primarily due to other personnel, conversations, and noise.
  • The authors aim to spark further research into minimizing distractions during surgical procedures to enhance safety measures, including the need for silence during anesthesia induction.

Article Abstract

Usually, the circulating registered nurse assists with anesthesia induction, but other personnel tend to interrupt the process to ask questions that are unrelated to the induction process. Interruptions and distractions can lead to loss of focus and result in medication errors if a certified registered nurse anesthetist (CRNA) swaps syringes during anesthesia induction. In this study, 8 CRNAs and cycles of anesthesia induction were observed, and the number of interruptions and distractions recorded. Results showed that most were from other personnel (M = 3 ± 0.53), conversation (M = 3 ± 1.19), and noise (M = 1.5 ± 1.3). With an average of 7.5 total interruptions per 9 min, these results indicate that CRNAs may experience 68 interruptions and distractions per hour. In another setting, this number is likely to be different. We have chosen to publish this provocative article to stimulate other similar studies of interruptions and distractions in the surgical setting. More research may show whether silence during induction is upheld as a safety measure, and what might be solutions to distractions and interruptions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PSN.0b013e31821b5b84DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

interruptions distractions
20
anesthesia induction
16
registered nurse
8
interruptions
7
induction
6
distractions
5
anesthesia
4
distractions anesthesia
4
induction pilot
4
pilot study
4

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • A study in Jordan found a 2.4% prevalence of vaccine administration errors (VAEs) during the COVID-19 vaccination campaign, with various types of errors identified, including timing and dosing mistakes.
  • Most errors were minor or moderate, and significant contributing factors included healthcare provider issues and higher error rates during peak vaccination times and in the Southern region.
  • The findings highlight the need for more research and strategies to address VAEs to ensure effective immunization and patient safety.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aim: To map studies that tested an intervention orienting patient transfer to Postanesthesia Care Unit (PACU) and identify outcomes related to care safety.

Methods: Scoping review guided by recommendations of the JBI Manual and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guide. The Population, Concept, and Context (PCC) framework was used to develop the research question and consolidate inclusion and exclusion criteria in databases consulted without date parameters.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This research examined the network properties (network graph, centrality, and edge weights) of the 18 ADHD symptoms, based on the self-ratings of 300 adolescents. The findings indicated the three symptoms with the highest centrality values were "inattention", "wait", and "interrupt". For edge weights, there were positive large effect size associations for "lose" with "forgetful", "fidget with "run", "blurt" with "wait", and "wait" with "interrupt"; and positive moderate effect size associations for "careless" with "instruction", and "avoid" with "listen".

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Unhurried conversations are necessary for careful and kind care that is responsive and responsible to both patients and clinicians. Adequate conceptual development is an important first step in being able to assess and measure this important domain of quality of care. In this article, we expand on a preliminary model to identify the key microlevel communication practices that support an unhurried conversation, defined as an ongoing, mutual accomplishment between patient and clinician that proceeds through a range of verbal and nonverbal communication practices wherein one or more participants (mutually) regulate the sequence, spacing (temporal and spatial), and speed of interaction to make themselves available to the other and remove or suspend distractions from the environment in order to improve care.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Uniaxial static strain enhances osteogenic and angiogenic potential under hypoxic conditions in distraction osteogenesis.

J Orthop Surg Res

November 2024

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Stomatological Hospital, School of Stomatology, Southern Medical University, S366 Jiangnan Boulevard,Haizhu District, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, China.

Objective: Bone incision leads to interrupted and sluggish blood flow in the process of distraction osteogenesis (DO), creating a hypoxia (0-2% oxygen tension) at the center of the bone callus. This hypoxia is critical in the coupling of osteogenesis and angiogenesis during DO. This study aimed to investigate the effect of Uniaxial Static Strain (USS) on osteogenesis in osteoblasts under hypoxic conditions, with a focus on the expression of osteogenic markers and angiogenic factors.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!