Background: The Ross aortic valve replacement (AVR) offers excellent hemodynamic and clinical outcomes in most patients undergoing aortic root replacement. Because of ongoing debate regarding the durability of this procedure, long-term follow-up in a large adult Ross experience might be of interest.
Methods: Between 1994 and 2010, 230 adult patients underwent modified Ross root procedures. Mean age was 42.4±12.1 years (range, 20 to 68 years), 62% were male. Fifty-six patients (24%) had undergone one or more prior aortic valve interventions. Concomitant procedures were performed in 126 patients (55%), including 90 ascending aortic procedures. Presenting pathology was aortic insufficiency in 114 (50%) and aortic stenosis in 116 (50%).
Results: Hospital mortality or within 30 days was 2 of 230 patients (0.9%). During follow-up (mean, 7.8 years), 12 more patients died. At 15 years, survival was 94%, and freedom from autograft and allograft reoperation was 91% and 98%, respectively. Reoperation was required for 23 patients. Eighteen patients required reoperation on the autograft root; 11 of 18 (61%) had preoperative aortic insufficiency as their predominate aortic valve lesion. Freedom from autograft reoperation was not significantly different for patients with preoperative aortic insufficiency (87%) compared with patients who had aortic stenosis (94%; p=0.15). On multivariable analysis, no risk factors were significant for reoperation except for surgery before 2000 (p<0.0001) and previous AVR (p=0.05).
Conclusions: Preoperative aortic regurgitation was not a significant risk factor for late autograft reoperation in adults. The Ross AVR provides excellent hemodynamics and survival for adults willing to accept a small risk of reoperation as opposed to a life-long risk of thromboemboli and anticoagulation therapy as exist with mechanical aortic prostheses. Reoperation risk for Ross AVR has decreased with Ross annulus sinotubular junction reinforcement replacement of a dilated ascending aorta and postoperative hypertension management.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.02.012 | DOI Listing |
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
January 2025
Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY. Electronic address:
Objectives: While valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSRR) has demonstrated satisfactory outcomes, its utility in a reoperative sternotomy setting remains uncertain. This study evaluates the perioperative safety and long-term durability of reoperative sternotomy VSRR.
Methods: All consecutive VSRR at two centers from 2005-2020 were included.
Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars
January 2025
Department of Cardiology, Gülhane Faculty of Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Türkiye.
Severe mitral regurgitation (MR) following surgical repair of the mitral valve poses a significant clinical challenge. Patients who have undergone surgery are typically at high risk for a second operation. This report details the case of a 54-year-old male who underwent aortic valve replacement and mitral valve repair using a 34-ring, 14 years prior.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Clin Med
December 2024
Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.
Mediastinal mass syndrome represents a major threat to respiratory and cardiovascular integrity, with difficult evidence-based risk stratification for interdisciplinary management. We conducted a narrative review concerning risk stratification and difficult airway management of patients presenting with a large mediastinal mass. This is supplemented by a case report illustrating our individual approach for a patient presenting with a subtotal tracheal stenosis due to a large cyst of the thyroid gland.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAnn Thorac Surg Short Rep
December 2024
Division of Adult Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
This report presents the case of a 66-year-old man with acute torrential aortic insufficiency after a Ross procedure 20 years earlier, a biologic aortic valve replacement 16 years earlier, and a transcatheter valve-in-valve 4 years earlier. He underwent third-time sternotomy, revealing that the pulmonary autograft was heavily calcified and frozen to the homograft. The previous transcatheter valve-in-valve was explanted.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAnn Thorac Surg Short Rep
September 2024
Department of Surgery, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, Florida.
Moderate or severe aortic insufficiency is a contraindication to transvalvular Impella left ventricular assist device (Abiomed) use out of concern for worsening valvular insufficiency and recirculation. This report describes the case of a 75-year-old man with severe eccentric aortic insufficiency and systemic hypoperfusion who was supported with a transvalvular Impella 5.5 device for 6 days as preoperative rehabilitation before aortic valve replacement.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!