A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Expression and prognostic significance of CEACAM6, ITGB1, and CYR61 in peripheral blood of patients with gastric cancer. | LitMetric

Background: We examined CEACAM6, ITGB1, and cyr61 concentrations from patients with gastric cancers (GCs) to assess their clinical application for diagnosing and monitoring diseases.

Methods: Real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction was used to detect the expressions of CEA, CEACAM6, ITGB1, IGF1R, CK20, cyr61, and S100A4 in peripheral blood karyocyte from 82 patients with GC, 24 patients with recurrence, and 37 healthy volunteers. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were constructed.

Results: There were significant association between these CEACAM6, ITGB1, and cyr61 and TNM Stages and distant metastasis. The AUC of CEACAM6 was 0.884 ± 0.044 (P = 0.0001), the AUC of cyr61 was 0.833 ± 0.047 (P = 0.0001), and the AUC of ITGB1 was 0.838 ± 0.042 (P = 0.0001) by differentiating preoperative GC patients from healthy volunteers from ROC curve analysis. The AUC of CEACAM6 was 0.761 ± 0.066 (P = 0.001), the AUC of CYR61 was 0.762 ± 0.063 (P = 0.001), and the AUC of ITGB1 was 0.824 ± 0.051 (P = 0.0001), by differentiating recurrence of GC from healthy volunteers from ROC curve analysis.

Conclusion: The method of detecting the expression of CEACAM6, ITGB1, and CYR61 in peripheral blood of GC patients was more sensitive than CEA, IGF1R, CK20, and S100A4 for the early diagnosis of metastasis and recurrence.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jso.21984DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ceacam6 itgb1
20
itgb1 cyr61
16
peripheral blood
12
healthy volunteers
12
cyr61 peripheral
8
blood patients
8
patients gastric
8
igf1r ck20
8
recurrence healthy
8
auc ceacam6
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!