AI Article Synopsis

  • The study examines how the diameter of fibers in bioresorbable scaffolds affects the behavior of human dermal fibroblasts, focusing on cell shape, adhesion, and growth.
  • Cells on microfiber scaffolds showed more developed actin structures and larger adhesion complexes than those on nanofiber scaffolds.
  • While nanofiber scaffolds promoted faster cell proliferation in the short term, microfiber scaffolds led to higher proliferation rates after two weeks, indicating that fiber diameter plays a critical role in cellular response and tissue engineering effectiveness.

Article Abstract

Background: The ideal scaffold material should provide immediate capacity to bear mechanical loads and also permit eventual resorption and replacement with native tissue of similar mechanical integrity. Scaffold characteristics such as fiber diameter provide environmental cues that can influence cell function and differentiation. In this study, the impact of fiber diameter of scaffolds constructed from a tyrosine-based bioresorbable polymer on cellular response was investigated.

Methods: Electrospun bioresorbable poly(desamino tyrosyl-tyrosine ethyl ester carbonate) scaffolds composed of microfibers or nanofibers were constructed and seeded with human dermal fibroblasts. The impact of fiber diameter on actin cytoskeletal morphology, focal adhesion size, fibronectin matrix assembly, and cell proliferation was evaluated using immunofluorescent microscopy and computer-assisted image analysis.

Results: Actin stress fibers were more easily observed in cells on microfiber scaffolds compared with those on nanofiber scaffolds. Cells on nanofiber scaffolds developed smaller focal adhesion complexes compared with those on microfiber scaffolds (p < 0.0001). The temporal patterns of fibronectin matrix assembly were affected by scaffold fiber diameter, with cells on microfiber scaffolds showing a delayed response in dense fibril formation compared with nanofiber scaffolds. Cells on nanofiber scaffolds showed higher proliferation compared with microfiber scaffolds at time points under 1 week (p < 0.01), but by 2 weeks significantly higher cell proliferation was observed on microfiber scaffolds (p < 0.01).

Conclusions: The fiber diameter of bioresorbable scaffolds can significantly influence cell response and suggests that the ability of scaffolds to elicit consistent biological responses depends on factors beyond scaffold composition. Such findings have important implications for the design of clinically useful engineered constructs.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3103705PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182139fa4DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

fiber diameter
24
microfiber scaffolds
20
nanofiber scaffolds
16
scaffolds
13
fibronectin matrix
12
matrix assembly
12
influence cell
8
impact fiber
8
focal adhesion
8
cell proliferation
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!