Purpose: To determine the efficacy of different Scheimpflug-imaging parameters in discriminating between subclinical keratoconus, keratoconus eyes, and normal eyes.
Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Design: Comparative case series.
Methods: Pentacam Scheimpflug measurements were taken in eyes with mild to moderate keratoconus, subclinical keratoconus, or with myopic astigmatism (normal eyes). Several parameters provided by the software or derived from the elevation maps were evaluated and compared between the groups. The Mann-Whitney test, receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curves, and logistic regression analysis were used to compare the mean measurements and to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the parameters or constructed models.
Results: The corneal power and elevation measurements were statistically significantly higher and the cornea was significantly thinner in eyes with subclinical or clinical keratoconus than in normal eyes (P < .05). The ROC curve analysis showed high overall predictive accuracy of various elevation and thickness indices in discriminating ectatic corneas from normal corneas. Logistic regression analysis showed that the goodness of fit of a model using a combination of corneal power, thickness, and anterior elevation parameters was best in discriminating keratoconus eyes from normal eyes, whereas that of a model using a combination of corneal power, thickness, and posterior elevation was best in discriminating subclinical keratoconus eyes from normal eyes.
Conclusion: Combined analysis of anterior and posterior corneal power, elevation, and thickness data provided by the Scheimpflug device effectively discriminated between ectatic corneas and normal corneas.
Financial Disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.12.049 | DOI Listing |
Front Med (Lausanne)
November 2024
Oculens Clinic, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Purpose: The study aimed to determine the stability of topographic and tomographic indices measured with Pentacam and to evaluate the biomechanical parameters measured with Corvis ST in the diagnosis of subclinical keratoconus (sKCN) and clinical keratoconus (KCN).
Methods: This is a single-center cohort study with a retrospective review of topographic and tomographic indices and biomechanical parameters on adult patients with subclinical keratoconus (sKCN), clinical keratoconus (KCN), and healthy subjects (control group). The area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) was used to identify the cutoff values for evaluated indices able to distinguish between subjects with sKCN and those with KCN.
J Curr Ophthalmol
October 2024
Department of Ophthalmology, Rayong Hospital, Rayong, Thailand.
Ophthalmic Genet
November 2024
Aier Eye Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Cornea
September 2024
Department of Ophthalmology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Purpose: The aim of this study was to characterize the corneal layer thickness profile in different stages of keratoconus (KC).
Methods: Patients with clinical or subclinical KC without a history of contact lens use were retrospectively enrolled. We evaluated 164 eyes, including 69 clinical KC, 32 topographic KC (no clinical signs), 22 very asymmetric ectasia with normal topography and no clinical signs of ectasia (VAE-NT), and 41 control eyes.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol
November 2024
Department of Ophthalmology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Restoration of Damaged Ocular Nerve, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China.
Purpose: To detect subtle changes in early keratoconus by evaluating corneal epithelial thickness differences among patients with binocular very asymmetric ectasia (VAE) and normal subjects.
Methods: Corneal epithelial thickness was measured using the Fourier-domain AS-OCT system RTVue 100 (Optovue, Fremont, CA, USA). 152 eyes from 76 patients were divided into three groups: Very asymmetry ectasia-ectasia (VAE-E, n = 38), Very asymmetry ectasia-normal topography (VAE-NT, n = 38), and Normal control (NC, n = 76).
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!