A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Quality of image of grating target placed in vitreous of isolated pig eyes photographed through different implanted multifocal intraocular lenses. | LitMetric

Purpose: To determine the quality of the image of a grating target placed in the vitreous of isolated pig eyes and photographed through implanted refractive and diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses (IOL).

Methods: Refractive multifocal (NXG1, PY60MV), diffractive multifocal (ZM900, SA60D3) and monofocal (SA60AT, ZA9003) IOL were implanted in the capsular bag of isolated pig eyes. A grating target was placed in the vitreous and photographed through a flat or a wide-field viewing contact lens. The contrast of the grating targets of different spatial frequencies was measured.

Results: With the flat corneal contact lens, the gratings appeared clear and not distorted when viewed through the optics of the NXG1 and PY60MV for far vision but were distorted with reduced contrast when viewed through the optical zone for near vision. The images through the diffractive zone of the ZM900 and SA60D3 were more defocused than with the monofocal IOL (p < 0.005). Ghost images oriented centrifugally of the original image were seen with the ZM900 resulting in lower contrast at higher spatial frequencies than with the SA60D3 with less defocused images only in the central area. With the wide-field viewing contact lens, the images were less defocused and the contrast was comparable to both refractive and diffractive multifocal IOL.

Conclusion: Both refractive and diffractive multifocal IOL reduced the contrast of the retinal image when viewed through a flat corneal contact lens but less defocused when viewed through a wide-field viewing contact lens.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-3768.2011.02173.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

contact lens
20
diffractive multifocal
16
grating target
12
target vitreous
12
isolated pig
12
pig eyes
12
refractive diffractive
12
wide-field viewing
12
viewing contact
12
quality image
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!