Background: There are differences between the genders in their innate performances on simulation trainers, which may impair accurate assessment of psychomotor skills.

Methods: The performance of fourth-year students with no exposure to the Minimally Invasive Surgical Trainer compared based on gender, and other psychomotor skills.

Results: Our study included 16 male and 16 female students. After adjusting for choice of medical specialty (P<.001), current video game use (P=.6), and experience in the operating room (P=.4), female sex was an independent factor for worse performance (P=.04) in multivariate models. Women took more time than men (P<.01) and made more errors (29 versus 25 on 3 reps, P<.01).

Conclusions: Among medical students with no previous exposure to laparoscopic trainers, female students perform worse than male students after adjusting for confounding factors. This difference must be recognized by training programs while using simulators for training and evaluation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/lap.2010.0368DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

continue ignore
4
ignore gender
4
gender differences
4
differences performance
4
performance simulation
4
simulation trainers?
4
trainers? background
4
background differences
4
differences genders
4
genders innate
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!