A national dosimetric audit of IMRT.

Radiother Oncol

North Western Medical Physics, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.

Published: May 2011

Background And Purpose: A dosimetric audit of IMRT has been carried out within the UK between June 2009 and March 2010 in order to provide an independent check of safe implementation and to identify problems in the modelling and delivery of IMRT.

Methods And Materials: A mail based audit involving film and alanine dosimeters was utilized. Measurements were made for each individual field in an IMRT plan isocentrically in a flat water-equivalent phantom at a depth of 5cm. The films and alanine dosimeters were processed and analysed centrally; additional ion chamber measurements were made by each participating centre.

Results: 57 of 62 centres participated, with a total of 78 plans submitted. For the film measurements, all 176 fields from the less complex IMRT plans (including prostate and breast plans) achieved over 95% pixels passing a gamma criterion of 3%/3mm within the 20% isodose. For the more complex IMRT plans (mainly head and neck) 8/245 fields (3.3%) achieved less than 95% pixels passing a 4%/4mm gamma criterion. Of the alanine measurements, 4/78 (5.1%) of the measurements differed by >5% from the dose predicted by the treatment planning system. Three of these were large deviations of -77.1%, -29.1% and 14.1% respectively. Excluding the three measurements outside 10%, the mean difference was 0.05% with a standard deviation of 1.5%. The out of tolerance results have been subjected to further investigations.

Conclusions: A dosimetric audit has been successfully carried out of IMRT implementation by over 90% of UK radiotherapy departments. The audit shows that modelling and delivery of IMRT is accurate, suggesting that the implementation of IMRT has been carried out safely.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2011.03.016DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

dosimetric audit
12
imrt
8
audit imrt
8
imrt carried
8
modelling delivery
8
alanine dosimeters
8
complex imrt
8
imrt plans
8
achieved 95%
8
95% pixels
8

Similar Publications

The aim of this work was to evaluate results of a remote electronic portal imaging based dosimetric auditing method using Task-Group 218 clinical gamma evaluation criteria (3%,2 mm, 10% dose threshold). For intensity modulated radiation therapy the results were (mean ± 1 SD) 97.9 ± 4.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Proton beam therapy, when integrated with MRI guidance, presents complex dosimetric challenges due to interactions with magnetic fields. Prior research has emphasized the nuanced impact of magnetic fields on dosimetry. For thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) the electron-return effect, alongside small air cavities surrounding the pellets, can lead to nonuniform dose distributions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background And Aims: Proton therapy (PRT) for Head Neck Cancer (HNC), in view of the Bragg peak, spares critical structures like oral mucosa better than IMRT. In PRT, mouth-bites, besides immobilising and separating mucosal surfaces, may also negate the end-of-range effect. We retrospectively analysed the details and dosimetric impact of mouth-bites in PRT for HNC.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • This study examined how the quality of calibration beams affects the calibration coefficients for measuring absorbed doses to water in an ionization chamber during on-site dosimetry audits.
  • It compared dose measurements of 200 photon beams and 184 electron beams taken before and after the calibration of the ionization chamber.
  • Results showed that the differences between institution-measured doses and audit-measured doses were minimal for photon beams, but the electron beam measurements indicated a larger discrepancy, highlighting that the calibration using linac beams was most consistent for electron reference dosimetry.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a widely employed strategy for intracranial metastases, utilizing linear accelerators and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Ensuring precise linear accelerator performance is crucial, given the small planning target volume (PTV) margins. Rapid dose falloff is vital to minimize brain radiation necrosis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!