A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Liver resection combined with local ablation: where are the limits? | LitMetric

Liver resection combined with local ablation: where are the limits?

Dig Surg

Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.

Published: October 2011

Background/aims: Partial hepatectomy for liver tumors is potentially curative but unfortunately available only for a limited number of patients. Local tumor destruction by ablation has expanded criteria for treatment and potential cure for patients with liver tumors. This paper gives an overview of the possibilities and limitations of ablation of liver tumors.

Methods: A search of relevant peer-reviewed literature was conducted.

Results: Investigations in the second half of the 18th century paved the way for application of electromagnetic fields in living organisms. Currently, indications for thermoablation are (1) unresectable liver tumors, (2) bridging therapy for a more definitive treatment, (3) debulking of symptomatic hormonally active liver tumors, and (4) patients unfit for major abdominal procedures. Although randomized trials on the use of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are scarce, the results thus far suggest that the combination of partial liver resection and local ablation offers cure rates in the same order of magnitude as partial liver resection - the 'gold standard' - alone. Additionally, RFA seems to be associated with a lower morbidity and mortality rate as compared to partial liver resection. One of the disadvantages is the reported high incidence of ablation site recurrences of sometimes up to 30%. This is especially related to a larger size of ablated tumors and tumors close to large vessels. Also, RFA is a rather time-consuming procedure. On theoretical grounds, ablation with microwaves is more effective and faster and seems to be associated with a lower incidence of ablation site recurrences.

Conclusions: Ablation has acquired a place in the arsenal of treatment modalities for patients with liver tumors and expanded the indications for treatment with a curative intent. Further evolution of the technique and the proof that it has at least the same oncological result with a lower morbidity as partial hepatectomy are required in the near future.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000323823DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

liver tumors
20
liver resection
16
partial liver
12
liver
10
ablation
9
local ablation
8
partial hepatectomy
8
patients liver
8
associated lower
8
lower morbidity
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!