Objectives: To determine whether Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) followed by Radiotherapy (RT) (RFA-RT) produces better palliation in terms of pain than RT alone in patients with osteolytic bone metastases.
Methods: Patients with solitary bone metastases and a pain score of least 5 or more on the VAS scale were selected. Fifteen patients were treated with RFA-RT (20 Gy delivered in 5 fractions of 4 Gy over 1 week) and were compared with a matched group (30 subjects) treated by RT.
Results: A complete response in terms of pain relief at 12 weeks was documented in 16.6% (5/30) and 53.3% (8/15) of the subjects treated by RT or RFA-RT, respectively (p = 0.027). The overall response rate at 12 weeks was 93.3% (14 patients) in the group treated by RFA-RT and 59.9% (18 patients) in the group treated by RT (p = 0.048). Although recurrent pain was documented more frequently after RT (26.6%) than after RFA-RT (6.7%) the difference did not reach statistical significance. The morbidity related to RT did not significantly differ when this treatment was associated with RFA.
Conclusions: Our results suggest that RFA-RT is safe and more effective than RT. The findings described here should serve as a framework around which to design future clinical trials.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2133-3 | DOI Listing |
Oncol Res Treat
March 2022
UO Radioterapia Oncologica, Villa Santa Teresa, Bagheria, Palermo, Italy.
Introduction: Bone metastases (BMs) are the common cause of cancer-related pain, as approximately 45% of cancer patients suffer from bone pain (BP). Radiotherapy (RT) is well established as BP treatment strategy; also, other approaches have been shown to be effective in this setting. Radiofrequency thermoablation (RFA) in a combined strategy with RT appears to be feasible and effective in the treatment of metastatic BP ensuring a better quality of life.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci
May 2021
Villa Santa Teresa, Radioterapia Oncologica, Bagheria, Palermo, Italy.
Objective: Approximately 50% of cancer patients develop bone metastases in their natural disease history. The management of metastatic bone disease requires a multidisciplinary approach. Both radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and radiation therapy (RT) were safe and effective in the management of painful metastases, even if they rely on totally different action mechanisms.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAm J Hosp Palliat Care
May 2019
2 Department of Radiology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Purpose:: The spinal column is the most common location for osseous metastases and is associated with pain and decreased quality of life. This study evaluated combined radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with radiation therapy (RT) compared to RFA alone for improving pain and local control.
Methods:: This was a single-institution retrospective review of patients who underwent RFA of spinal metastases between 2016 and 2017, with or without RT to the same vertebral level.
Eur Radiol
September 2011
Department of Experimental Medicine, Division of Radiation Oncology and Radiobiology, S. Salvatore Hospital, University of L'Aquila, Medical School, Via Vetoio Coppito 2, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.
Objectives: To determine whether Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) followed by Radiotherapy (RT) (RFA-RT) produces better palliation in terms of pain than RT alone in patients with osteolytic bone metastases.
Methods: Patients with solitary bone metastases and a pain score of least 5 or more on the VAS scale were selected. Fifteen patients were treated with RFA-RT (20 Gy delivered in 5 fractions of 4 Gy over 1 week) and were compared with a matched group (30 subjects) treated by RT.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!