Objective: The consultation request process between primary care and specialty services often contains paper-based components that may be inefficient and difficult to track. Other barriers may include workarounds and communication breakdowns with the potential to adversely impact delivery of quality medical care. We investigated current challenges to the electronic outpatient consult management process in the United States Veterans Health Administration (VHA).
Design: We conducted ethnographic observation and semi-structured interviews in nine different specialty clinics and three primary care clinics in a large, tertiary Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC). We also performed a national-level query of 'electronic error and enhancement requests' (E3Rs) related to the consult package in the VA's electronic health record (EHR) submitted over a 5-year period (2005-2009).
Measurements: Two researchers recorded the observable interactions and interview responses of 16 healthcare workers related to their work with consultations. Two separate coding schemes were applied to both the observational and the interview data. E3Rs from the national query were reviewed and categorized based on the nature of the enhancement requests.
Results: We identified several examples of paper persistence, as well as workarounds, communication breakdowns, and redundancies in computerized consult management. An analysis of enhancement requests for the consults also revealed three broad needs related to reporting, configuration or customization, and user interface enhancements.
Conclusion: Understanding these challenges to the current consult management process is important to help design enhanced informatics tools integrated into workflow to support coordination of care and tracking of consults requests.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.03.016 | DOI Listing |
Digit Health
October 2024
Department of Public Health, Research Unit of General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark.
Health Soc Care Deliv Res
October 2024
Peninsula School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Plymouth, ITTC Building, Davy Road, Plymouth Science Park, Plymouth, UK.
Background: As a matter of policy, voluntary, community and social enterprises contribute substantially to the English health and care system. Few studies explain how the National Health Service and local authorities commission them, what outputs result, what contexts influence these outcomes and what differentiates this kind of commissioning.
Objectives: To explain how voluntary, community and social enterprises are commissioned, the consequences, what barriers both parties face and what absorptive capacities they need.
Hosp Pediatr
August 2024
Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics.
Background And Objectives: Hospitalized families who use languages other than English (LOE) for care encounter unique communication challenges, as do children with medical complexity (CMC). We sought to better understand communication challenges and opportunities to improve care of families who use LOE from the perspectives of hospital staff and Spanish-speaking parents of CMC.
Methods: This qualitative project involved secondary analysis of transcripts from a study on family safety reporting at 2 quaternary care children's hospitals and additional primary data collection (interviews) of staff and parents.
Health Informatics J
May 2024
National Hospital Organization, Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Complex socio-technical health information systems (HIS) issues can create new error risks. Therefore, we evaluated the management of HIS-related errors using the proposed human, organization, process, and technology-fit framework to identify the lessons learned. Qualitative case study methodology through observation, interview, and document analysis was conducted at a 1000-bed Japanese specialist teaching hospital.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAsia Pac J Clin Oncol
August 2024
Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Australia.
Aim: Oncology care provision by multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) is widely acknowledged as best practice. Formal team meetings, led by chairpersons, coordinate decisions on diagnosis, staging, treatment planning, and review. This study addresses a gap in meeting Chairs' perspectives on factors affecting functionality across the meeting cycle, from pre-meeting patient list triage to post-meeting dissemination of recommendations.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!