Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Purpose: We aimed to evaluate reliability of self-reported information on skin cancer among individuals aged > 65 years with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).
Methods: A test-retest was performed with patients completing two questionnaires one month apart.
Results: Among 102 recruited patients the response rate was 97.1% (mean age 80.9 years, 74.8% men). The majority of items showed substantial agreement: history of skin cancer screening (k = 0.88), past skin cancer in general (k = 0.92), basal cell carcinoma (k = 0.75), patient delay (k = 0.64) and total delay (k = 0.86). Agreement was high also for ages > 80 years. Recall of past SCCs (k = 0.48) and sunscreen use (k = 0.38) was less accurate.
Conclusions: Our study provided evidence on the reliability of patient reported skin cancer information among elderly individuals, who represent the majority of affected cases.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2011.02.013 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!