Newtonian and special-relativistic predictions for the trajectories of a low-speed scattering system.

Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys

School of Science, Monash University, 46150 Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia.

Published: March 2011

Newtonian and special-relativistic predictions, based on the same model parameters and initial conditions for the trajectory of a low-speed scattering system are compared. When the scattering is chaotic, the two predictions for the trajectory can rapidly diverge completely, not only quantitatively but also qualitatively, due to an exponentially growing separation taking place in the scattering region. In contrast, when the scattering is nonchaotic, the breakdown of agreement between predictions takes a very long time, since the difference between the predictions grows only linearly. More importantly, in the case of low-speed chaotic scattering, the rapid loss of agreement between the Newtonian and special-relativistic trajectory predictions implies that special-relativistic mechanics must be used, instead of the standard practice of using Newtonian mechanics, to correctly describe the scattering dynamics.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.83.036201DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

newtonian special-relativistic
12
special-relativistic predictions
8
low-speed scattering
8
scattering system
8
scattering
7
predictions
6
newtonian
4
predictions trajectories
4
trajectories low-speed
4
system newtonian
4

Similar Publications

The principle of equivalence as a criterion of identity.

Synthese

October 2018

Department of Philosophy, University of Bristol, Cotham House, Bristol, BS6 6JL UK.

In 1907 Einstein had the insight that bodies in free fall do not "feel" their own weight. This has been formalized in what is called "the principle of equivalence." The principle motivated a critical analysis of the Newtonian and special-relativistic concepts of inertia, and it was indispensable to Einstein's development of his theory of gravitation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The general theory of relativity predicts that a star passing close to a supermassive black hole should exhibit a relativistic redshift. In this study, we used observations of the Galactic Center star S0-2 to test this prediction. We combined existing spectroscopic and astrometric measurements from 1995-2017, which cover S0-2's 16-year orbit, with measurements from March to September 2018, which cover three events during S0-2's closest approach to the black hole.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The statistical predictions of Newtonian and special-relativistic mechanics, which are calculated from an initially Gaussian ensemble of trajectories, are compared for a low-speed scattering system. The comparisons are focused on the mean dwell time, transmission and reflection coefficients, and the position and momentum means and standard deviations. We find that the statistical predictions of the two theories do not always agree as conventionally expected.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The newtonian and special-relativistic statistical predictions for the mean, standard deviation and probability density function of the position and momentum are compared for the periodically-delta-kicked particle at low speed. Contrary to expectation, we find that the statistical predictions, which are calculated from the same parameters and initial gaussian ensemble of trajectories, do not always agree if the initial ensemble is sufficiently well-localized in phase space. Moreover, the breakdown of agreement is very fast if the trajectories in the ensemble are chaotic, but very slow if the trajectories in the ensemble are non-chaotic.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

We show, contrary to expectation, that the trajectory predicted by general-relativistic mechanics for a low-speed weak-gravity system is not always well-approximated by the trajectories predicted by special-relativistic and newtonian mechanics for the same parameters and initial conditions. If the system is dissipative, the breakdown of agreement occurs for chaotic trajectories only. If the system is non-dissipative, the breakdown of agreement occurs for chaotic trajectories and non-chaotic trajectories.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!