Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the sealing ability of EndoSequence Bioceramic Root-end Repair (BCRR) material when compared with white mineral trioxide aggregate (WMTA).
Study Design: Forty single-rooted teeth were instrumented, obturated with gutta-percha, root-end resected, and retrofilled with 2 different materials: white ProRoot MTA (WMTA) (n = 15) and BCRR (n = 15). Unfilled specimens (n = 10) received no retrofill and were used as controls. All groups received E. faecalis in a created reservoir coronal to the root filling and the presence of microleakage was evaluated by counting the colony-forming units from each specimen. The results were analyzed with 1-way analysis of variance.
Results: There was no significant difference in leakage between the 2 experimental groups, but there was a significant difference with the control (P ≤ .05).
Conclusions: This study suggests that BCRR is equivalent in sealing ability to WMTA when used as root-end filling material in vitro.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.01.030 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!