Kraepelin's work is frequently cited and repeatedly interpreted as groundwork for the categorical classification of mental disorders. The scope of this paper is to present a fragment of Kraepelin's contribution to the nosology of manic-depressive illness from another point of view. Studying conscientiously the original text written by Emil Kraepelin more than one hundred years ago, the reader could conclude that the author's attitudes were more in line with numerous contemporaries who promote the dimensional approach to the classification in psychiatry and spectrum concept of mood disorders. This text is an attempt to inspire the reader to examine the original textbook.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2011.03.032 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Emil Kraepelin and Walter Benjamin: distant contemporaries, diverse working methods, any resonance?
Int Rev Psychiatry
September 2024
Psychiatric University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
The work methods of eminent psychiatrist Emil Kraepelin (1856-1926) and of literary and cultural critic Walter Benjamin (1892-1940) are described based on the literature describing their ways of working. Kraepelin's approach of cross-sectional observation of symptoms and the longitudinal study of illness course in distinguishing 'disease entities' as well as his research strategy of investigating causes and correlates using methods of experimental psychology, pathology and neurobiology are described. Critical statements (on Kraepelin's work) highlighting preconceived concepts, ideological positions and a lack of critical reflection are reported.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWhat kind of «thing» is mental illness? Listening to Kraepelin, Jaspers and Kronfeld.
Int Rev Psychiatry
September 2024
Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Psychiatric University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
Since its beginnings psychiatry controversely debated about the appropriate concept of illness, about nosology and the diagnostic terms and procedures based upon it. This paper discusses the approaches introduced by Emil Kraepelin (1856-1926), Karl Jaspers (1883-1969) and Arthur Kronfeld (1886-1941). Whereas Kraepelin postulated the existence of «natural entities» with regard to mental illness, Jaspers acknowledged the heuristic value of the term «disease entity», but declared it a «regulative idea» in a Kantian sense, i.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSynthesising 30 years of clinical experience and scientific insight on affective temperaments in psychiatric disorders: State of the art.
J Affect Disord
October 2024
Psychiatry Unit, Asl Biella, Italy. Electronic address:
The concept of affective temperament has been extensively discussed throughout the history of psychopathology and represents a cornerstone in the study of mood disorders. This review aims to trace the evolution of the concept of affective temperaments (ATs) from Kraepelin's seminal work to the present day. In the 1980s, Akiskal redefined Kraepelin's concept of affective temperaments (ATs) by integrating the five recognized ATs into the broader framework of the soft bipolar spectrum.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFUnitary psychosis (Einheitspsychose): A conceptual history.
J Affect Disord
August 2024
Roman Circle of Psychopathology and Italian National Institute for Health, Migration and Poverty (INMP), Italy. Electronic address:
Aims: The objective of this paper is to explore the evolution of the forms of madness and the model that accounts for it over time. The classical distinction between several categories of mental disorders is contrasted with the idea of unitary psychosis.
Methods: Historical conceptual analysis.
What is Alzheimer's disease? An analysis of nosological perspectives from the 20th and 21st centuries.
Eur J Neurol
November 2024
École des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, Paris, France.
Article Synopsis
- Recent US proposals to define Alzheimer's disease solely by β-amyloidosis have sparked significant debates, reminiscent of past discussions about the importance of brain lesions and clinical presentation.
- This review tracks the evolution of Alzheimer's nosology over three historical periods: its early 20th-century identification, the 1960s-1980s redefinition, and today's focus on biological versus clinicobiological definitions.
- The historical context reveals ongoing controversies regarding Alzheimer's pathogenesis, the significance of brain lesions, and variations in clinical symptoms, emphasizing the complex nature of defining diseases in medical practice.
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!