Study Design: Retrospective case series.

Objective: The primary aim of this study was to evaluate and report the 2-year clinical and radiographic outcomes associated with a L5-S1 interbody fusion procedure that employs an axial presacral surgical approach.

Summary Of Background Data: There are a number of lumbar interbody fusion procedures used to treat painful, degenerated discs. However, despite their procedural differences (e.g., anterior vs. posterior), all of the current surgical approaches are undertaken in the same anatomical plane that requires disruption of musculoligamentous and osseous support structures as well as vascular and neurologic tissue to gain access the intervertebral disc space. The presacral procedure is distinct in that it uses an approach along an axis essentially perpendicular to the anatomical plane of traditional fusion procedures.

Methods: One hundred fifty-six patients from four clinical sites were selected for inclusion if they underwent a L5-S1 interbody fusion via the presacral approach with the AxiaLIF system (TranS1, Wilmington, NC) and had both presurgical and 2-year radiographic or clinical follow-up. Back pain and functional impairment were evaluated with an 11-point numeric scale and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), respectively, preoperatively and at 2 years. Standard radiographic imaging techniques were used to determine fusion status.

Results: Marked clinical improvements were realized in back pain severity and functional impairment through 2 years of follow-up. Mean pain scores improved from 7.7 ± 1.6 (n = 155) preoperatively to 2.7 ± 2.4 (n = 148) at 24 months, reflecting an approximate 63% overall improvement (P < 0.001). Mean ODI scores improved from 36.6 ± 14.6% (n = 86) preoperatively to 19.0 ± 19.2% (n = 78) at 24 months, or approximately 54% (P < 0.001). Two-year clinical success rates on the basis of change relative to baseline of at least 30% were 86% (127 of 147) and 74% (57 of 77) for pain and function, respectively. The overall radiographic fusion rate at 2 years was 94% (145 of 155).

Conclusion: Findings from this clinical series of patients treated with a presacral interbody fusion procedure, stabilized with the AxiaLIF rod, reflect favorable and durable outcomes through 2 years of follow-up.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31821b3e37DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

interbody fusion
20
l5-s1 interbody
12
axial presacral
8
fusion
8
two-year clinical
8
clinical radiographic
8
radiographic outcomes
8
fusion procedure
8
anatomical plane
8
follow-up pain
8

Similar Publications

This case report describes a 70-year-old male presenting with limb weakness, urinary retention and tandem cervical and lumbar spinal stenosis with complicating white cord syndrome, a rare reperfusion injury post decompression surgery. Initially admitted following an unwitnessed fall, the patient's neurological examination indicated that progressive weakness of the limbs and sensory loss etiology is cervical and lumbar spondylosis with severe spinal canal stenosis, confirmed by imaging. Due to rapid deterioration, he underwent C5 corpectomy, cervical decompression and fusion.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Study Design: Radiographic analysis.

Objective: Evaluate the anatomical relationships of the bowel to the lateral surgical corridor and the spine in various surgical positions.

Summary Of Background Data: Retroperitoneal transpsoas lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) may be performed with patients in the prone position, allowing for lateral and posterior approaches to the spine without repositioning the patient.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Lumbar foraminal stenosis can be surgically treated by foraminal decompression or facet joint resection and fusion (transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, TLIF). While conventional foraminal decompression poses a risk of segmental instability, the endoscopic approach (extended endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy, EELF) resects only the ventral part of the facet joint with a horizontal surgical trajectory. A prospective observational study was performed to analyze the cost-effectiveness of EELF versus TLIF.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Anterior cervical interbody fusion (ACDF) has become a classic surgical procedure for the treatment of cervical degenerative diseases, and various interbody cages are widely used in this procedure. We used 3D printing technology to produce a new type of plate-locking cage, anticipating to achieve high fusion rate with the high biomechanical stability. This study is to compare the biomechanical characteristics between a newly designed interbody cage and a conventional Zero-profile cage during ACDF using finite element analysis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: One-hole split endoscopy (OSE) is a novel endoscopic technique that offers some advantages in spinal surgery. However, without a clear understanding of the safe zone for OSE, surgeons risk injuring nerve roots during the procedure. This study aimed to measure the safe distances among critical bone markers, the intervertebral space and nerve roots between 1-degree degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS) and non-DLS at the L segment in patients via three-dimensional reconstruction and to compare the differences in relevant safety distances between the two groups.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!