Background: A large disparity in medical health care is clearly evident between developed and underserved nations in the field of cardiac electrophysiology, specifically pacemaker implantation. This study aimed to assess the safety of pacemaker reuse.

Methods And Results: A computerized search from January 1, 1970, to September 1, 2010, identified 18 studies with outcomes of pacemaker reuse. The primary outcome was pacemaker infection or device erosion as defined by each individual study protocol. Secondary end points were device malfunction defined as a defect in the structural or electric integrity of the pulse generator. Pooled individual patient data (n=2270) from 18 trials were included in the analysis. The proportion of patients in whom an infection developed after pacemaker reuse was 1.97% (1.15% to 3.00%). There was no significant difference in infection rate between pacemaker reuse and new device implantation (odds ratio, 1.31 [0.50 to 3.40], P=0.580). The proportion of patients in whom device malfunction developed after pacemaker reuse was 0.68% (0.27% to 1.28%). Compared with new device implantation, there was an increased risk for malfunction in the reuse group (odds ratio, 5.80 [1.93 to 17.47], P=0.002). This difference was mainly driven by abnormalities in set screws, which possibly occurred during device extraction, as well as nonspecific device "technical errors."

Conclusions: This study suggests that pacemaker reuse has an overall low rate of infection and device malfunction and may be a safe and efficacious means of treating patients in underserved nations with symptomatic bradyarrhythmias and no other method of obtaining a device. However, the results also denote a higher rate of device malfunction as compared with new device implantation. Patients with highly symptomatic conduction disease may benefit from pacemaker reuse; however, they should be closely monitored for device malfunction, especially during implantation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.110.960112DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pacemaker reuse
28
device malfunction
20
underserved nations
12
device
12
device implantation
12
pacemaker
9
safety pacemaker
8
reuse
8
infection device
8
proportion patients
8

Similar Publications

Introduction: cardiac pacing is the only lifesaving procedure which is effective for major cardiac conduction disorders. In sub-Saharan Africa, few pacemakers are implanted, compared to Western countries. This study aimed to describe the indications for cardiac pacing in four hospitals in Senegal, to evaluate its practical modalities, to identify pacemaker's complications and their predisposing factors and to evaluate the main challenges for cardiac pacing in Senegal.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: The reuse pacemakers is a beneficial technique for patients in countries with a low economic standard of living where health care is almost non-existent. We offered to share the experience of Senegal on the reconditioning of pacemakers.

Methodology: We conducted a retrospective study over a period from January 2015 to December 2020 including all patients who benefited from a reconditioned pacemaker for primary implantation or reimplantation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Reimplantation of Implantable Cardiac Devices-An Ethical Controversy?

Am J Ther

July 2023

Basic, Preventive and Clinical Sciences Department, Transilvania University, Brasov, Romania.

Background: Cardiovascular diseases are an important public health problem, the main cause of death in both men and women, with a continuous increasing prevalence and consequences upon morbidity in economic, physical, and psychological terms.The new technology have made possible the development of innovative devices, which have increased the possibility of therapeutic interventions today, extending the life of the population with cardiovascular pathology, transforming the patient care, and providing a complex, personalized therapeutic approach.

Fields Of Uncertainty: The aim of the study was to evaluate from an ethical perspective the need, feasibility, and safety of reusing cardiac pacemakers to revise the legal terms and requirements.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Longevity and potential reusability of cardiac implantable electronic devices explanted in funeral homes.

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol

July 2023

Nursing Department, Faculty of Medicine and Nursing, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU,Sarriena, Leioa, Spain.

Background: While in high-income countries (HICs) the implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is common, in certain low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) access to devices is limited and insufficient to meet the demand. Between 17% and 30% of CIEDs explanted post-mortem in HICs appears to have enough battery life to be reused but devices are not routinely programmed to no pacing output and continue to consume battery after the patient's death. Therefore, we conducted a prospective analysis of CIEDs collected from funeral homes, controlling variables such as the date of explantation and limiting the time until the date of interrogation to 6 months.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!