The incidence of esophageal bolus impaction: is there a seasonal variation?

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg

Department of ENT & Maxillofacial Surgery, NÄL Medical Centre Hospital, Trollhättan, Sweden.

Published: February 2011

Objectives: Eosinophilic esophagitis is a disease associated with dysphagia and has a seasonal variation in incidence. The primary aim of this study was to search for a potential seasonal variation in the incidence of esophageal foreign bodies or food impaction. In addition, after exclusion of structural or accidental causes, the authors sought to explore if such a variation would differ between patients with or without atopic disorders.

Study Design: Case series with chart review.

Setting: NÄL Medical Centre Hospital, a secondary referral hospital.

Subjects And Methods: A total of 314 consecutive cases of esophageal bolus impaction from 2004 through 2009 were included and analyzed regarding seasonal variation in incidence. The analysis was repeated after exclusion of cases with sharp items, cancer, or atresia and again separately after subdividing this group according to presence of atopy.

Results: The overall incidence of esophageal bolus impaction was significantly higher during summer and fall than during the corresponding winter and spring period. In cases with atopic disorders and soft foods or meat bolus obstruction (n = 90), the incidence during the fall was significantly higher than that during the winter, and the incidence during the summer and fall was significantly higher than the corresponding incidence during the winter and spring. This variation was not present in patients without any signs or symptoms of atopy.

Conclusions: There was a significant seasonal variation in the incidence of acute esophageal bolus impaction. This variation was pronounced in patients with a coexisting atopic diathesis but was nonsignificant in patients without atopy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0194599810392655DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

esophageal bolus
16
bolus impaction
16
seasonal variation
16
variation incidence
16
incidence esophageal
12
incidence
9
summer fall
8
winter spring
8
fall higher
8
variation
7

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • The study examines how the rheology (flow behavior) of ingested fluids affects swallowing and the physiological responses during deglutition, specifically comparing xanthan gum (XG) and sodium carboxymethylcellulose gum (CMC) in healthy adults.
  • Results showed that CMC had significantly higher viscosity than XG at higher shear rates (300 s), leading to increased flow resistance during swallowing, indicated by higher intrabolus pressure and altered relaxation times of the upper esophageal sphincter (UES).
  • The findings suggest that the differences in shear viscosity of these fluids affect pharyngeal function during swallowing, highlighting the importance of fluid properties over standardized viscosity levels (IDDSI).
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic inflammatory process of the esophagus often associated with structural and motility problems. Previous studies have shown an increased prevalence in males over females, however there is little data exploring the risk of esophageal complications among genders, which may be indicative of differences in disease severity.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study using National Inpatient Sample data including adults hospitalized between 2016 and 2020 presenting with EoE.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: An attempt at medical management is often the initial step in addressing esophageal obstruction from an impacted food bolus. Medical management, however, has limited success and often requires urgent endoscopy. We present a case in which standard medical treatment failed, but a swallowing augmentation maneuver resolved the obstruction.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: We aimed to analyze the episodes of esophageal food bolus impaction (EFI) occurred over a time of 15 years in children admitted to a large pediatric emergency department (PED), documenting their clinical presentation, underlying pathology, management, biopsy rate, and follow-up visits. Additionally, to combine our institutional experience with the existing literature, a comprehensive review was conducted.

Methods: We reviewed the medical records of all children presenting to our PED with EFI from 2010 to 2024.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Blended tube feeds are reported to be better tolerated in some children compared to standard commercial enteral formulas, allowing children to normalise feeding by having similar foods as the rest of the family. However, a blended tube feed is contraindicated in patients who are immunocompromised or require post-pyloric feeding as a result of a food safety risk. Other contraindications for blended diet include children who require continuous pump feeding via gastrostomy or nasogastric feeding tube (< 12 Fr) and fluid restrictions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!