Reporting results of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome surgery trials.

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94115, USA.

Published: April 2011

Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome surgery studies largely evaluate single procedures or procedure combinations in case series designs, but it can be difficult to compare results across studies. The authors present a standardized format for presentation of surgical study results to facilitate pooled analyses and subgroup analyses. The format includes thorough characterization of baseline subject characteristics and the use of outcome measures that reflect the spectrum of obstructive sleep apnea and its consequences. As the apnea-hypopnea index is the most common, albeit controversial, primary outcome measure in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome surgery studies, the authors propose analysis and reporting standards to facilitate understanding its role as an outcome measure. Because surgical outcomes vary according to subject characteristics, investigators should also evaluate the potential association between baseline subject characteristics and outcomes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5951288PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0194599810396791DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

obstructive sleep
16
sleep apnea
16
apnea syndrome
12
syndrome surgery
12
subject characteristics
12
surgery studies
8
studies authors
8
baseline subject
8
outcome measure
8
reporting obstructive
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!