Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
A variety of density functional theory (DFT) methods are paired with Pople basis sets of varying sizes and evaluated for use with organoselenium compounds. The ability of each method to predict reliable geometries and energies is determined through comparison with quadratic configuration interaction with single and double excitations (QCISD) results. The recommended procedure for accurate prediction of energies and geometries is to use the B3PW91 functional with the 6-311G(2df,p) basis set. The B3PW91/6-31G(d,p) level of theory gives almost identical geometries as larger basis sets, so geometries can be predicted at this level for computational efficiency.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp201455f | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!