Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: The use of intraoperative ultrasonography (US) to localize and guide excision of nonpalpable breast lesions has advantages over other techniques. It avoids the need for additional resources and minimizes patient morbidity.
Methods And Results: The technique of surgeon-performed US-guided excision as described in this report is straightforward and safe, easily reproducible, and suitable for teaching.
Conclusions: The US-guided breast excision technique is predictable and accurate, minimizes costs, and is advocated as an appropriate method for US-visible lesions requiring surgical excision. With appropriate training, breast surgeons can easily acquire the necessary skills to incorporate the use of US in their surgical practice.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-011-1082-y | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!