A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

[Noninvasive assessment of coronary artery with substantial contrast volume reduction using 320-detector row computed tomography: a feasibility study]. | LitMetric

The recently introduced 320-detector row computed tomography (320-row CT) allows very fast volumetric acquisition of the entire heart. Because the total amount of contrast agent required for CT coronary angiography (CTCA) depends directly on the acquisition time, 320-row CTCA would substantially reduce the contrast agent dose. The objective of this retrospective study was to evaluate the feasibility of contrast volume reduction on 320-row CTCA compared with 64-detector row CTCA (64-row CTCA). We retrospectively reviewed consecutive 320- and 64-row CTCA data (16 eligible cases for each; administrated contrast volume, 20-24 ml for the former and 50-65 ml for latter) from a homogeneous patient population (age ≤ 81, body weight ≤ 67 kg, and heart rate ≤ 69 bpm). The two types of CTCA data were compared with respect to the successful rate of adequate intravascular contrast enhancement defined as the number of segments with attenuations of more than 250 HU divided by total number of coronary segments evaluated. Our dataset provided mean intravascular attenuation values of 320 and 404 HU on the 320- and 64-row CTCA, respectively. Although the attenuation values were statistically lower for the 320-row CTCA (P < 0.001), there was no significant difference in the successful rates of adequate intravascular contrast enhancement (rate of 0.98 for each; P > 0.05). We therefore conclude that 320-row CTCA is a feasible method of diagnostic imaging and is superior to 64-row CTCA because it uses less of the contrast medium.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.6009/jjrt.67.145DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

320-row ctca
16
64-row ctca
16
contrast volume
12
ctca
11
contrast
8
volume reduction
8
320-detector row
8
row computed
8
computed tomography
8
contrast agent
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!