A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Accuracy assessment for navigated maxillo-facial surgery using an electromagnetic tracking device. | LitMetric

Accuracy assessment for navigated maxillo-facial surgery using an electromagnetic tracking device.

J Craniomaxillofac Surg

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.

Published: February 2012

Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy and the usability of an electromagnetic tracking device in maxillo-facial surgery through testing on a phantom skull under operating room (OR) conditions.

Material And Methods: A standard plastic skull phantom was equipped with a custom made model of the maxilla and with target markers and dental brackets. Imaging was performed with a computed tomography (CT) scanner. The extent and robustness of the electromagnetic tracking system's target registration error (TRE) was evaluated under various conditions.

Results: For each measurement a total of 243 registrations were performed with 5 point registration and 4374 registrations with 6 point registration. The average target registration error for the 5 point registration under OR conditions was 2.1 mm (SD 0.86) and 1.03 (SD 0.53) for the 6 point registration. Metallic instruments applied to the skull increased the TRE significantly in both registration methods.

Conclusion: The electromagnetic tracking device showed a high accuracy and performed stable in both registration methods. Electromagnetic interference due to metallic instruments was significant but the extent of TRE was still acceptable in comparison to optical navigation devices. A benefit of EM tracking is the absence of line-of-sight hindrance. The test setting simulating OR conditions has proven suitable for further studies.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2011.03.003DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

electromagnetic tracking
16
point registration
16
tracking device
12
maxillo-facial surgery
8
registration
8
target registration
8
registration error
8
metallic instruments
8
electromagnetic
5
tracking
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!