AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to compare the impact of inserting an i-gel supraglottic airway device, LMA, and endotracheal tube on intraocular pressure (IOP) and haemodynamic responses during general anaesthesia.
  • Results showed that the i-gel device did not raise IOP, while the endotracheal tube significantly increased IOP and heart rate, leading to a notable decrease in perfusion index; the LMA also raised IOP but to a lesser degree.
  • Overall, the i-gel device had milder effects on IOP and haemodynamics than both LMA and endotracheal tube insertion, suggesting it may be a safer option for certain patients.

Article Abstract

Context: We hypothesised that the effects of insertion of an i-gel supraglottic airway management device on intraocular pressure (IOP) and haemodynamic variables would be milder than those associated with insertion of a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) or an endotracheal tube.

Objectives: This study evaluated IOP and haemodynamic responses following insertion of an i-gel airway, LMA or endotracheal tube.

Design And Setting: This was a randomised controlled study in a tertiary care centre in which 60 adults scheduled for elective non-ophthalmic procedures under general anaesthesia were allocated to one of three groups. Patients with pre-existing glaucoma, cardiovascular, pulmonary or metabolic diseases or anticipated difficult intubation were excluded.

Interventions: Following induction of general anaesthesia, an endotracheal tube, LMA or i-gel device was inserted.

Main Outcome Measures: IOP, SBP, DBP, heart rate (HR) and perfusion index were measured before induction of anaesthesia and before and after insertion of the airway device.

Results: Insertion of the i-gel did not increase IOP. Insertion of an endotracheal tube increased IOP from 11.6 ± 1.6 to 16.5 ± 1.7 mmHg (P < 0.001). The post-insertion IOP exceeded the pre-induction value (P < 0.05). Insertion of the LMA increased IOP from 13.0 ± 1.5 to 14.7 ± 1.8 mmHg (P < 0.01), but this did not exceed the pre-induction value. Tracheal intubation significantly increased HR, SBP and DBP. Insertion of the LMA significantly increased HR and SBP. These increases were significantly higher than those which followed insertion of the i-gel device. Insertion of the endotracheal tube or LMA resulted in a significant decrease in perfusion index which was maintained for 5 min following tracheal intubation and for 2 min after insertion of the LMA. Insertion of the i-gel device did not change perfusion index significantly.

Conclusion: Insertion of the i-gel device provides better stability of IOP and the haemodynamic system compared with insertion of an endotracheal tube or LMA in patients undergoing elective non-ophthalmic surgery.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0b013e328345a413DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

insertion i-gel
28
endotracheal tube
20
i-gel device
16
insertion
15
iop haemodynamic
12
tube lma
12
insertion endotracheal
12
insertion lma
12
intraocular pressure
8
haemodynamic responses
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!