Background: Contrary to international practice, cardiac rehabilitation (CR) in Germany is predominantly offered as comprehensive inpatient treatment lasting for 3 weeks. Evidence for this kind of health care is poor, comprising observational cohort studies only.
Methods: We conducted a systematic search for relevant German studies (1990-2004). International studies were selected from recent meta-analyses. Medium-term (12 month) results for blood lipids, blood pressure, functional capacity and psychological wellbeing, as well as cardiac morbidity and mortality are reported.
Results: For most outcomes, effect sizes in national studies are poorer than those from international interventions or, in the case of blood pressure and depression, even poorer than international controls.
Conclusions: Altogether, our analysis does not suggest that comprehensive inpatient rehabilitation treatment is superior to international practice of long-term outpatient rehabilitation.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1741826710389530 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!