Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Introduction: The concepts of clinical guidelines contribute to the decision-making and improvement in the quality of medical supply. This paper provides a literature research on rehabilitation guidelines and their evaluation by the "German Instrument for Methodological Guideline Appraisal (DELBI)".
Methods: The clinical guideline research was conducted with the help of an online database as well as expert surveys conducted between August and October 2007. The literature research was updated in October 2008. Only those guidelines that satisfied specific criteria were included in the evaluation.
Results: Although the research yielded 124 guidelines, only 28 were included in the evaluation after applying the criteria. In total, the evaluation was heterogeneous. With regard to each domain, the mean degree of fulfillment reached between 2.1% and 58.3%.
Discussion: Due to an extensive and detailed literature research and expert survey, all relevant clinical guidelines for rehabilitation, which are valid in Germany, could be gathered. A first examination of the guidelines seems to reveal several deficiencies. Possible reasons are discussed.
Conclusion: This paper reveals a detailed survey of the clinical guidelines for rehabilitation. Compared to acute-care medicine, the number of available guidelines is distinctly smaller. With regard to the DELBI criteria, an enormous development in the quality of guidelines for rehabilitation is still necessary. Some of these might be due to inaccurate documentation, which will have to be considered in a further update.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1255084 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!