AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to determine if single-legged horizontal hop test ratios are related to patient-reported outcome measures like IKDC, KOOS, and Marx activity levels in patients two years post-ACL reconstruction.
  • Results showed a moderate correlation between the triple-hop ratio and some IKDC and KOOS scores, but weaker correlations for single-hop and timed hops; no significant links were found for the Marx activity level.
  • Despite these correlations, multivariable modeling revealed that hop test results explain less than 25% of the variability in outcome scores, suggesting that both patient-reported tools and hop tests provide valuable but distinct information about physical function.

Article Abstract

Purpose: The hypothesis of this study was that single-legged horizontal hop test ratios would correlate with IKDC, KOOS, and Marx activity level scores in patients 2 years after primary ACL reconstruction.

Methods: Individual patient-reported outcome tools and hop test ratios on 69 ACL reconstructed patients were compared using correlations and multivariable modeling. Correlations between specific questions on the IKDC and KOOS concerning the ability to jump and hop ratios were also performed.

Results: The triple-hop ratio was moderately but significantly correlated with the IKDC, KOOS Sports and Recreation subscale, and the KOOS Knee Related Quality of Life subscale, as well as with the specific questions related to jumping. Similar but weaker relationship patterns were found for the single-hop ratio and timed hop. No significant correlations were found for the Marx activity level or crossover-hop ratio. Multivariable modeling showed almost no significant additional contribution to predictability of the IKDC or KOOS subscores by gender, BMI, or the number of faults on either leg.

Conclusions: The triple-hop test is most significantly correlated with patient-reported outcome scores. Multivariable modeling indicates that less than a quarter of the variability in outcome scores can be explained by hop test results. This indicates that neither test can serve as a direct proxy for the other; however, assessment of patient physical function by either direct report using validated outcome tools or by the hop test will provide relatively comparable data.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3417814PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1473-5DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ikdc koos
20
hop test
16
multivariable modeling
12
correlate ikdc
8
primary acl
8
test ratios
8
marx activity
8
activity level
8
patient-reported outcome
8
outcome tools
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!