Background: Use of top tethers with forward-facing child restraints is a simple way for parents to keep their children safer when travelling in passenger vehicles, but tether use remains low.
Objectives: To obtain an updated estimate of top tether use.
Methods: Data on forward-facing child restraints were collected through an observational survey in the Washington DC metropolitan area during July-August 2010. The study sample included all forward-facing restraints that were installed in parked passenger vehicles and visible such that tether use could be observed. For each restraint, certified child passenger safety technicians collected information on the vehicle, seat row, restraint position, and tether.
Results: A total of 1321 cars, minivans, pickups, and sport utility vehicles, with a total of 1543 forward-facing child restraints, were observed. Tethers were used with 43.0% of all forward-facing child restraints. Tether use was similar (42.7-45.4%) among cars, minivans, and sport utility vehicles but lower (17.2%) for pickups. Tether use was higher (47.5%) for 2001 and newer vehicles, but dropped to 43.0% when only taut installations were considered.
Conclusions: Despite LATCH education campaigns and the increased availability of tether anchors, observed tether use was less than 50%. Tether use was even lower in older vehicles, yet many children continue to travel in these vehicles. If tether anchors are unavailable, parents should be encouraged to retrofit vehicle seating positions. Because many child restraints are still installed with vehicle seat belts, efforts to educate parents on the importance of tether use regardless of installation method may be warranted.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ip.2010.030171 | DOI Listing |
Traffic Inj Prev
November 2024
Center for Injury Research and Prevention, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Objectives: To assess the interaction of multiple rearward-facing (RF) and forward-facing (FF) CRS restrained pediatric occupants on their kinetics in oblique impacts.
Methods: A Q3s and a Q1.5 ATD were restrained in 2 CRSs of varying widths-standard (503mm) and slim-fit (425mm)-in the 2 rear outboard seats of a 2023 compact sedan rigidized rear seat bench.
Stapp Car Crash J
October 2024
Injury Biomechanics Research Center, The Ohio State University.
Forward-facing child restraint systems (FF CRS) and high-back boosters often contact the vehicle seat head restraint (HR) when installed, creating a gap between the back surface of the CRS and the vehicle seat. The effects of HR interference on dynamic CRS performance are not well documented. The objective of this study is to quantify the effects of HR interference for FF CRS and high-back boosters in frontal and far-side impacts.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTraffic Inj Prev
June 2024
Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
Objective: Many children with physical disabilities need additional postural support when sitting and supplementary padding is used on standards approved child restraints to achieve this when traveling in a motor vehicle. However, the effect of this padding on crash protection for a child is unknown. This study aimed to investigate the effect of additional padding for postural support on crash protection for child occupants in forward facing child restraints.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTraffic Inj Prev
March 2024
ProBiomechanics LLC, Bloomfield Hills, MI, USA.
Objective: The history of airbags was reviewed for benefits and risks as they became a supplement to lap-shoulder belts. Sled and crash tests were evaluated and field data was analyzed for airbag effectiveness. Field data on airbag deaths and studies on mechanisms of deployment injury were analyzed.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTraffic Inj Prev
August 2023
Patrick M. Magoon Institute for Healthy Communities, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Background: Child restraint systems (CRSs) significantly reduce risk of crash-related injury, however installation and use errors undermine their benefits. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) created the Ease of Use (EOU) rating system to help guide consumers and incentivize manufacturers to improve their products. The EOU rating system assigns one to five stars to four CRS features and overall.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!