Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
This study compares the performance of the all-atom molecular dynamics force fields OPLS-AA and COMPASS, and the united-atom GROMOS96 ff53a6 force field, for organic monolayers at aqueous interfaces, as a function of surface density, temperature, and system size. Where possible, comparison with experimental data was undertaken and used to scrutinize the performance of each force field. We find close agreement between the all-atom force fields (OPLS and COMPASS) and experiment for the description of organic monolayers on water. However, the united-atom force field 53a6 tends to exhibit poorer agreement than the all-atom force fields.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp1116867 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!