A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Value of black blood T2* cardiovascular magnetic resonance. | LitMetric

Value of black blood T2* cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

J Cardiovasc Magn Reson

CMR Unit, Royal Brompton Hospital, and National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Sydney Street, London SW3 6NP, UK.

Published: March 2011

Purpose: To assess whether black blood T2* cardiovascular magnetic resonance is superior to conventional white blood imaging of cardiac iron in patients with thalassaemia major (TM).

Materials And Methods: We performed both conventional white blood and black blood T2* CMR sequences in 100 TM patients to determine intra and inter-observer variability and presence of artefacts. In 23 patients, 2 separate studies of both techniques were performed to assess interstudy reproducibility.

Results: Cardiac T2* values ranged from 4.5 to 43.8 ms. The mean T2* values were not different between black blood and white blood acquisitions (20.5 vs 21.6 ms, p=0.26). Compared with the conventional white blood diastolic acquisition, the coefficient of variance of the black blood CMR technique was superior for intra-observer reproducibility (1.47% vs 4.23%, p<0.001), inter-observer reproducibility (2.54% vs 4.50%, p<0.001) and inter-study reproducibility (4.07% vs 8.42%, p=0.001). Assessment of artefacts showed a superior score for black blood vs white blood scans (4.57 vs 4.25; p<0.001).

Conclusions: Black blood T2* CMR has superior reproducibility and reduced imaging artefacts for the assessment of cardiac iron, in comparison with the conventional white blood technique, which make it the preferred technique for clinical practice.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3062187PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-13-21DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

black blood
20
white blood
16
blood t2*
12
conventional white
12
t2* cardiovascular
8
cardiovascular magnetic
8
magnetic resonance
8
blood
8
t2* values
8
black
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!