Purpose: To investigate inter-/intra-observer variability in defining the prostate by use of planning computed tomography (PCT) and cone beam CT (CBCT) with magnetic resonance image (MRI) as guidance prior to the introduction of an adaptive radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

Material And Methods: We reviewed PCT and firstly acquired CBCT datasets of each ten patients with prostate cancer. Three physicians independently delineated the prostate based on PCT and CBCT with MRI as guidance, allowing determination of inter-physician variability. Two physicians repeated prostate contouring three times in total to investigate intra-physician variability. We compared delineated prostate volumes in terms of the generalized conformity index (CI(gen)), maximum variation ratio (MVR), and center of mass (COM).

Results: There were no significant inter-/intra-observer differences in the estimation of prostate volume on both PCT and CBCT. For both inter- and intra-observer variability in contouring the prostate gland, there were no significant differences in MVR between PCT and CBCT. The CI(gen) for inter-observer variability was 0.74 by PCT and 0.69 by CBCT. The CI(gen) for intra-observer variability on PCT and CBCT was 0.84 and 0.81 for observer 2 and 0.76 and 0.73 for observer 3. COM analyses showed that the greatest inter-/intra-observer variability was in the measurement of the prostate apex and base. With respect to CI(gen) and COM analysis for the inter-observer variability, more precise delineation of the prostate was possible on PCT than CBCT. More precise contouring in terms of both CI(gen) and COM was demonstrated by observer 2 than observer 3.

Conclusions: Despite some ambiguity in apex and base level, there was a good consistency in delineating the gland on CBCT plus MRI-guided modification both among/within observer(s), without any significant difference from the consistency in defining the prostate on PCT. This study provides a framework for future studies of CBCT imaging of the prostate.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/0284186X.2011.562916DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pct cbct
20
prostate
13
intra-observer variability
12
computed tomography
12
cbct
10
variability
9
pct
9
inter- intra-observer
8
variability contouring
8
contouring prostate
8

Similar Publications

Background And Purpose: Radiotherapy (RT) treatment planning is based on a planning computed tomography scan (pCT), while the decision to treat is often already established on a diagnostic CT scan (dCT). The objective of this study was to evaluate the usage of dCT for palliative radiation planning of soft tissue tumoral masses (STTMs), removing the need for a pCT scan and associated attendances.

Materials And Methods: RT planning was performed retrospectively to 38 STTMs of 7 anatomical sites using volumetric modulated arc therapy techniques in dCT and transferred to pCT.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Unsupervised Bayesian generation of synthetic CT from CBCT using patient-specific score-based prior.

Med Phys

December 2024

Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Article Synopsis
  • CBCT scans are crucial for patient alignment in radiotherapy, but their image quality is often compromised by artifacts and inaccurate Hounsfield unit values, limiting their quantitative applications.
  • The study introduces an unsupervised learning approach utilizing a patient-specific diffusion model to generate synthetic CT images from CBCT, improving image quality for adaptive radiotherapy.
  • Results demonstrated that this method effectively reduced artifacts in CBCT images from various cancer types, enhancing the potential for better clinical outcomes in radiotherapy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine whether virtual computed tomography (vCT) derived from daily cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), or on-treatment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can replace quality assurance computed tomography (qCT) in our clinical workflow to minimize imaging dose and potentially anesthesia exposure in patients requiring plan adaptation.

Methods And Materials: Pediatric patients (age <24 years) treated from 2020 to 2023 with intensity modulated proton therapy with at least 1 qCT during proton therapy were eligible. For cases that required plan adaptation, the dose was recalculated on vCT and compared with same-day qCT as well as the original planning computed tomography (pCT).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Deep learning-based multiple-CT optimization: An adaptive treatment planning approach to account for anatomical changes in intensity-modulated proton therapy for head and neck cancers.

Radiother Oncol

January 2025

Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China; Institute of Radiation Oncology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China; Hubei Key Laboratory of Precision Radiation Oncology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China. Electronic address:

Article Synopsis
  • Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) is sensitive to uncertainties in patient positioning and anatomical changes, prompting the need for improved treatment planning methods.
  • A new framework utilizing deep learning for dose prediction based on multiple-cone-beam CT (CBCT) images was developed, which includes a dose mimicking algorithm to create robust treatment plans.
  • Results showed that treatment plans generated from this method were more effective, providing better dose distribution and safety for surrounding healthy tissues compared to traditional planning methods.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

During a radiotherapy (RT) course, geometrical variations of target volumes, organs at risk, weight changes (loss/gain), tumor regression and/or progression can significantly affect the treatment outcome. Adaptive RT has become the effective methods along with technical advancements in imaging modalities including cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Planning CT (pCT) can be modified via deformable image registration (DIR), which is applied to the pair of pCT and CBCT.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!