Purpose: To quantify the frequency of perceived honorary authorship in radiologic journals and to identify specific factors that increase its prevalence.

Materials And Methods: This study qualified for exempt status by the institutional review board. An electronic survey was sent to first authors of all original research articles published in Radiology and European Radiology over 3 years. Questions included guidelines used for determining authorship, contributions of coauthors, the perception of honorary authorship, and demographic information. Univariable analysis of sample proportions was performed by using χ(2) tests. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the independent factors that were associated with the probability of perceiving honorary authorship.

Results: Of the 392 (29.3%) of 1338 first authors who responded to the survey, 102 (26.0%) perceived that one or more coauthors did not make sufficient contributions to merit being included as an author. Of the 392 respondents, 231 (58.9%) stated that one or more coauthors performed only "nonauthor" tasks according to International Committee of Medical Journal Editors criteria. Factors associated with an increased first-author perception of honorary authorship included lower academic rank (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 2.89; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.66, 5.06), as well as working in an environment in which the section or department head was automatically listed as an author (adjusted OR: 3.80; 95% CI: 2.13, 6.79). The percentage of honorary authorship was significantly higher (P = .019) among respondents who did not follow journal requirements for authorship.

Conclusion: The rate of perceived honorary authorship (overall, 26.0%) was substantially more frequent among respondents of lower academic rank and in those working in an environment in which their section or department head was automatically listed as an author.

Supplemental Material: http://radiology.rsna.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1148/radiol.11101500/-/DC1.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.11101500DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

honorary authorship
24
authorship radiologic
8
perceived honorary
8
perception honorary
8
factors associated
8
lower academic
8
academic rank
8
working environment
8
environment department
8
department head
8

Similar Publications

Purpose: The determination of authorship order in scientific publications is critical for researcher recognition and career progression. According to a recent survey's meta-analysis, the prevalence of Honorary Authorship reaches 20% of authors. This study evaluates the adoption and proficency of authorship guidelines in maxillofacial surgery and otolaryngology.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Tackling algorithmic bias and promoting transparency in health datasets: the STANDING Together consensus recommendations.

Lancet Digit Health

January 2025

University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK; National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, Birmingham, UK; Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, School of Health Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. Electronic address:

Without careful dissection of the ways in which biases can be encoded into artificial intelligence (AI) health technologies, there is a risk of perpetuating existing health inequalities at scale. One major source of bias is the data that underpins such technologies. The STANDING Together recommendations aim to encourage transparency regarding limitations of health datasets and proactive evaluation of their effect across population groups.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aims: To explore nurses' attitudes towards safety and their association with nurses' perceptions of adverse events and quality of care in Saudi Arabian hospitals.

Design: A cross-sectional study using a web-based survey.

Methods: A web-based survey was administered to nurses working in five hospitals in Saudi Arabia.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Hormone replacement therapy and non-gynaecological cancers.

Post Reprod Health

December 2024

Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Wrexham Maelor Hospital, Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Wrexham, North Wales.

Background: There is lack of knowledge and awareness about HRT use in non-gynaecological cancer survivors. The decision to advocate or discourage HRT in such women depends on various factors, including cancer type, hormone sensitivity, and individual patient characteristics. The paucity of available good quality clinical evidence and epidemiological data leads to lack of consensus in such cases.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Time plays a critical role in diagnosing headache disorders and understanding their underlying mechanisms, highlighting the need for effective timing analysis in headache research.
  • A review of studies covering primary headache types—migraine, tension-type headache, and cluster headache—reveals distinct timing patterns, such as circadian rhythms in migraines and night-time occurrences in cluster headaches.
  • Understanding these time patterns can improve the phenotyping, management, and treatment of headache disorders, pointing towards new, personalized approaches in headache care.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!