Background: Human papillomavirus (HPV) types 16 and 18 are the 2 most frequent types associated with cervical cancer. Identifying their presence or absence in cervical samples may assist in triaging women for subsequent management. The Cervista HPV 16/18 genotyping test specifically detects the presence of HPV 16 and 18 in ThinPrep cervical specimens.

Objectives: The objective was to establish the analytical performance of the CERVISTA HPV 16/18 genotyping test.

Study Design: These studies were performed in support of a regulatory submission to the US Food and Drug Administration. Here we report the analytical sensitivity (limit of detection), accuracy compared to consensus L1 gene PCR/bi-directional sequencing, precision, reproducibility, and cross-reactivity (specificity) of the genotyping test.

Results: Analytical sensitivity for detection of HPV 16 and 18 ranged between 625 and 1250 copies/reaction for both types. When compared to PCR/sequencing for women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance cytology, the positive percent agreement was 94.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 89.8-96.7) and the negative percent agreement was 85.7% (95% CI, 82.4-88.4). The test demonstrated high within-laboratory and inter-operator precision. Reproducibility within sites and between 3 testing sites resulted in 100% agreement with expected results (150 positive, 90 negative results). The genotyping test did not exhibit cross-reactivity to DNA from common low-risk HPV types and other microorganisms found in the human female reproductive tract.

Conclusions: These analytical performance data support the use of CERVISTA HPV 16/18 genotyping test for the detection and differentiation of HPV 16 and 18 in ThinPrep cervical cytology specimens.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2011.01.016DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cervista hpv
16
hpv 16/18
16
16/18 genotyping
16
genotyping test
16
analytical performance
12
hpv
9
performance cervista
8
cervical cytology
8
hpv types
8
hpv thinprep
8

Similar Publications

Objective: This study investigated whether random urine (RU) samples can be used to accurately identify human papillomavirus (HPV) and whether these samples can replace self-collected vaginal samples in HPV tests.

Methods: A total of 167 patients with abnormal Pap smears were recruited. The patients provided self-collected vaginal and RU samples for HPV testing.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: High-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) infection is linked with uterine cervix premalignant lesions and invasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix.

Methods: Descriptive cross sectional study carried out among female kidney transplant (KTx) recipients in Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi-Kenya. We studied the risk factors for acquisition of hrHPV, examined cervical cytology and assayed for 14 hrHPV DNA using Cervista® HPV HR test and Cervista® MTA (Hologic®) automated platforms.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: This study evaluated the detection accuracy of the Cobas human papillomavirus (HPV) assay for high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) and HPV-16 in head and neck fine-needle aspiration (FNA) specimens with squamous cell carcinoma.

Methods: Head and neck FNA biopsy specimens from 2012 to 2020 were retrospectively collected. Cobas HPV testing was performed on 90 FNA specimens with valid Cervista HPV testing results.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Cervical screening uptake is declining in several countries. Primary care practitioners could play a greater role in maximising uptake, but better understanding is needed of practitioners' cervical screening-related behaviours. Among general practitioners (GPs) and practice nurses, we aimed to identify cervical screening-related clinical behaviours; clarify practitioners' roles/responsibilities; and determine factors likely to influence clinical behaviours.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

2020 list of human papillomavirus assays suitable for primary cervical cancer screening.

Clin Microbiol Infect

August 2021

Institute of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Article Synopsis
  • Only clinically validated HPV assays are deemed suitable for cervical cancer screening, necessitating an update on high-risk HPV tests that meet the 2009 international validation criteria.
  • A systematic review of studies published from January 2014 to August 2020 was conducted to evaluate the clinical accuracy and reproducibility of various HPV assays using a comparison of index and comparator tests.
  • The analysis identified seven HPV DNA tests that consistently met the validation criteria across multiple studies, while others only partially fulfilled the requirements, highlighting the importance of rigorous testing for effective cervical cancer screening.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!