A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Influence of switching connection ports of double-lumen permanent tunnelled catheters on total solute removal during dialysis. | LitMetric

Introduction: Catheter dysfunction is a concern when using double-lumen catheters in hemodialysis (HD). Reversing the connection mode results in higher blood flows, but also enhanced recirculation. We evaluated total solute removal (TSR) of different uremic retention solutes during a complete HD session, once with reversed (RL) and once with correctly connected lines (CL).

Methods: Genius dialysis was performed in 22 HD patients at maximum blood flow (QB), once with CL and once with RL. TSR was determined for urea, creatinine, phosphate and ß2-microglobulin (ß2M). Using a kinetic model, we simulated TSR and reduction ratio (RR) for urea for different percentages of access recirculation and different QB during CL vs. RL.

Results: RR and TSR of the tested solutes were not different in clinical practice between CL and RL. Mathematically, urea RR did not differ with CL or RL, but TSR decreased by 4.5%-23.3% when changing from CL to RL for a recirculation of 5%-25%, respectively. For a recirculation of 5%-25%, QB in RL should be increased by 6.7% and 52.0%, 8.5% and 72.0%, and 10.0% and 115.2%, respectively, for a blood flow in CL mode of 150, 200 or 250 ml/min.

Conclusions: Connecting patients to double-lumen dialysis catheters in RL does not impair TSR in clinical practice. Mathematically, TSR during RL was dependent upon the obtained QB and degree of recirculation. A nomogram indicating the increase in QB needed in RL to obtain equal TSR as in the CL mode, at different degrees of recirculation, is provided.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.5301/JN.2011.6421DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

total solute
8
solute removal
8
tsr
8
blood flow
8
clinical practice
8
practice mathematically
8
recirculation 5%-25%
8
recirculation
6
influence switching
4
switching connection
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!