Introduction: Nutrient profiling is defined as the science of categorising foods based on their nutrient composition. The Choices Programme is a nutrient profile system with criteria that determine whether foods are eligible to carry a "healthier option" stamp. The Daily Menu Method which has been developed to evaluate these criteria is described here. This method simulates the change in calculated nutrient intakes which would be the result of consumers changing their diets in favour of food products that comply with the criteria.
Methods: Average intakes of energy, trans fatty acids (TFA), saturated fatty acids (SAFA), sodium, added sugar and fibre were derived from dietary intake studies and food consumption surveys of 7 countries: The Netherlands, Greece, Spain, the USA, Israel, China and South Africa. For each of the key nutrients, these average intakes were translated into three Typical Daily Menus per country. Average intakes based on these three menus were compared with average intakes from three Choices Daily Menus. To compose the Choices Menus, foods from the Typical Menus that did not comply with the Choices criteria were replaced with foods that did comply and are available on the market.
Results: Comparison of intakes from the Choices Menus with the survey data showed that calculated intakes of energy, SAFA, TFA, sodium and added sugar were reduced. Fibre intakes were increased. The size of the effect differed per country.
Conclusion: The Daily Menu Method is a useful means to predict the potential effects of nutrient profiles such as the Choices criteria, on daily nutrient intakes. The method can be applied internationally and confirms that the criteria of the Choices Programme are in line with the aim of the programme: to improve nutrient intakes in the direction of the recommendations.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3044133 | PMC |
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0014721 | PLOS |
Alzheimers Dement
December 2024
Northumbria University, Newcastle, United Kingdom.
Background: Mealtimes are a fundamental part of life; eating and drinking well is vital for health well-being. People living with dementia are at increased risk of eating and drinking difficulties, and may experience difficulties at mealtimes due to the cognitive component of this condition. Such difficulties are prevalent in care homes, where people living with dementia are often dependent on carers at mealtimes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAlzheimers Dement
December 2024
Yonsei university, Wonju-si, Gangwon-do, Korea, Republic of (South).
Background: Sleep directly affects daily life, and lack of sleep affects cognitive function and mental health. So, this study analyzed the performance structures of daily activities affecting sleep using social network analysis.
Methods: The subjects were 313 people over 50 years old.
Alzheimers Dement
December 2024
New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Background: Studies show that tube feeding does not improve clinical outcomes, and professional guidelines recommend against its use for individuals with advanced dementia. Yet, our preliminary work demonstrates a preference for tube feeding among Chinese-American dementia caregivers. We propose linguistic and cultural adaptation of "Making Choices: Feeding Options for Patients with Dementia (MCFODA) to create the Chinese version of this efficacious decision aid intervention.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAlzheimers Dement
December 2024
The University Of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Background: Mealtime is a fundamental daily activity to ensure nutrition, social interaction, and enjoyment of food for people with dementia (PWD). Interventions addressing multilevel barriers are critical to optimize mealtime care and outcomes. This review aimed to synthesize existing interventions on mealtime care and outcomes in PWD and their caregivers.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAlzheimers Dement
December 2024
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Background: Little is known about the prevalence and nature of role-sharing among family care partners and paid caregivers.
Method: We studied 440 participants in the 2015 National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) receiving paid help with self-care, mobility, or medical care. Guided by Litwak's task specificity model, we focus on frequency of receiving paid help only, help from care partners only, and role-sharing by task.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!