Background: Facial expression is widely used to judge pain in neonates. However, little is known about the relationship between intensity of the painful stimulus and the nature of the expression in term neonates.
Objectives: To describe differences in the movement of key facial areas between two groups of term neonates experiencing painful stimuli of different intensities.
Methods: Video recordings from two previous studies were used to select study subjects. Four term neonates undergoing circumcision without analgesia were compared with four similar male term neonates undergoing a routine heel stick. Facial movements were measured with a computer using a previously developed 'point-pair' system that focuses on movement in areas implicated in neonatal pain expression. Measurements were expressed in pixels, standardized to percentage of individual infant face width.
Results: Point pairs measuring eyebrow and eye movement were similar, as was the sum of change across the face (41.15 in the circumcision group versus 40.33 in the heel stick group). Point pair 4 (horizontal change of the mouth) was higher for the heel stick group at 9.09 versus 3.93 for the circumcision group, while point pair 5 (vertical change of the mouth) was higher for the circumcision group (23.32) than for the heel stick group (15.53).
Conclusion: Little difference was noted in eye and eyebrow movement between pain intensities. The mouth opened wider (vertically) in neonates experiencing the higher pain stimulus. Qualitative differences in neonatal facial expression to pain intensity may exist, and the mouth may be an area in which to detect them. Further study of the generalizability of these findings is needed.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3052401 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/873103 | DOI Listing |
Breastfeed Med
December 2024
Nursing Research Center, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran.
Preterm infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) frequently undergo painful procedures, which can lead to both short-term and long-term complications, including potential mortality. Effective pain management is crucial in this context. Although numerous studies have explored non-pharmacological pain relief methods for preterm infants, no research has simultaneously compared the effects of maternal breast milk odor, facilitated tucking, and nonnutritive sucking.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs
October 2024
Objective: To determine if performing heel stick procedures for capillary blood sampling without prior heel warming is noninferior to the standard practice of warming the heel in very-low-birth-weight newborns.
Design: Noninferiority randomized control trial.
Setting: The study took place in two Level 3 NICUs in The Netherlands.
Purpose: It is essential that studies of genomic sequencing (GS) in newborns and children include individuals from under-represented racial and ethnic groups (URG) to ensure future applications are equitably implemented. We conducted interviews with parents from URG to better understand their perspectives on GS research, develop strategies to reduce barriers to enrollment, and facilitate research participation.
Methods: Semi-structured interviews with 50 parents from URG.
Ann Med Surg (Lond)
September 2024
Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Province 1, Nepal.
Background: Pain in neonates is associated with adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes in the later days of life. Facilitated tucking is a nonpharmacological method of pain relief. The study aims to compare the effect of facilitated tucking in pain reduction in neonates.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAdv Neonatal Care
August 2024
Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!