AI Article Synopsis

  • The study evaluated the effectiveness of Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines implemented in 2006 at a surgical intensive care unit, with a focus on whether adding a surgical intensivist improved patient outcomes.
  • Data from 273 patients showed that while all treatment methods significantly decreased the length of stay and mortality, the group treated with both guidelines and a surgical intensivist had the best results.
  • The findings concluded that using evidence-based guidelines along with a surgical intensivist reduced both patient hospital stay and costs, and led to lower mortality rates compared to using the guidelines alone.

Article Abstract

Background: Our institution initiated the implementation of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines in 2006. We hypothesize that the addition of a surgical intensivist improved results more than the implementation of the guidelines alone.

Methods: We collected data on 273 patients who were admitted to the surgical intensive care unit for sepsis. The groups were divided into pre-bundle, n = 19; bundle, n = 186; and bundle-plus, n = 68, to denote the method by which the patients were treated for sepsis.

Results: There was no difference in age or sex between groups. There was a statistically significant decrease in length of stay (LOS) between the 3 groups, and in mortality between the bundle and bundle-plus treatment groups (P < .01). In addition, there was an average cost savings between each group.

Conclusions: Implementation of evidence-based guidelines decreased LOS and decreased cost in our surgical intensive care unit. By adding the expertise of a surgical intensivist, we reduced LOS, cost, and relative risk of death even further than using the guidelines alone.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.09.013DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

surgical intensivist
8
surgical intensive
8
intensive care
8
care unit
8
takes intensivist
4
intensivist background
4
background institution
4
institution initiated
4
initiated implementation
4
implementation surviving
4

Similar Publications

The Historical and Clinical Foundations of the Modern Neuroscience Intensive Care Unit.

World Neurosurg

December 2024

Clinical and Translational Neuroscience Unit, Department of Neurology and Feil Brain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA. Electronic address:

The subspecialty of neurocritical care has grown significantly over the past 40 years along with advancements in the medical and surgical management of neurological emergencies. The modern neuroscience intensive care unit (neuro-ICU) is grounded in close collaboration between neurointensivists and neurosurgeons in the management of patients with such conditions as ischemic stroke, aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, intracerebral hemorrhage, subdural hematomas, and traumatic brain injury. Neuro-ICUs are also capable of specialized monitoring such as serial neurological examinations by trained neuro-ICU nurses; invasive monitoring of intracranial pressure, cerebral oxygenation, and cerebral hemodynamics; cerebral microdialysis; and noninvasive monitoring, including the use of pupillometry, ultrasound monitoring of optic nerve sheath diameters, transcranial Doppler ultrasonography, near-infrared spectroscopy, and continuous electroencephalography.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: In patients with adult congenital heart disease (ACHD), significant atrioventricular valve regurgitation is an important risk factor for poor outcomes, such as heart failure. However, in many cases, transcatheter intervention may reduce the risk profile to avoid a high surgical risk.

Case Summary: A 44-year-old man with complex ACHD in the form of a double-inlet left ventricle, congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries, pulmonary atresia, atrial septal defect, and patent ductus arteriosus was referred for the treatment of severe tricuspid regurgitation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: We aimed to characterize sources of moral distress among providers in the context of surgery.

Background: Moral distress is defined as psychological unease generated when professionals identify an ethically correct action to take but are constrained in their ability to take that action. While moral distress has been reported among healthcare providers, the perspectives of providers working in surgery specifically are not often explored and reported.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Mortality Rate and Its Contributing Factors in Post-Surgical and Medical Patients with AKI Underwent CRRT.

Tanaffos

January 2024

Chronic Respiratory Diseases Research Center (CRDRC), National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (NRITLD), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) requires continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), which is one of the most important problems in medical and surgical patients. Therefore, it is very important to identify the influencing factors to reduce the dimensions of the problem. This study was conducted to investigate the mortality rate in medical and surgical patients with AKI requiring CRRT treatment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Blunt esophageal injury is an exceptionally rare condition, with complete esophageal avulsion being almost unprecedented in adults. This case study details the clinical presentation, surgical management, and postoperative course of a 50-year-old male who sustained a complete esophageal avulsion following blunt abdominal trauma. The patient presented with increasing abdominal pain two hours after falling while stepping up onto a high truck step, striking his upper abdomen on the step.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!