Objective: We sought to test the hypothesis that the transradial approach is associated with lower risk of adverse outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared to the transfemoral approach, and to examine whether the adoption of the transradial approach could result in improved quality of care for PCI in a single-center practice.

Background: Although previous research has suggested that the transradial approach is associated with lower risk of adverse outcomes following PCI, it is not widely used in the United States.

Methods: We identified 462 transradial and 625 transfemoral PCI cases that were treated at our center between January 2007 and March 2009. The differences between the transradial and transfemoral approaches in risks of in-hospital mortality, bleeding, and vascular complications as well as post-procedural lengths of stay were examined.

Results: The risk of bleeding was significantly lower in the transradial group (2.60%) than the transfemoral group (6.08%); the adjusted odds ratio (OR) was 0.34 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.17-0.68; p = 0.002]. The risk of vascular complications was also significantly lower (0% versus 1.44%, respectively; OR, 0.11; 95% CI, 0-0.68; p = 0.01). The observed in-hospital mortality rate was lower for the transradial approach (0.87% versus 2.24%), but the difference was not statistically significant (adjusted OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.14-2.10; p = 0.38). Same-day discharges were more common in the transradial patients (14.2% versus 2.2%; adjusted OR, 15.6; 95% CI, 7.76-31.44; p < 0.0001).

Conclusion: The risks of bleeding and vascular complications are lower for the transradial approach. Adopting the transradial approach may lead to improved care for PCI.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

transradial approach
28
approach associated
12
associated lower
12
lower risk
12
risk adverse
12
adverse outcomes
12
vascular complications
12
lower transradial
12
transradial
11
outcomes percutaneous
8

Similar Publications

Background: Cardiac catheterization via the trans-radial approach (TRA) has shown several advantages over the trans-femoral approach (TFA) but with a concern of higher radiation exposure. Considering the growing experience with TRA, this study compares patient's radiation during coronary angiography using TRA versus TFA.

Methods: This study included consecutive patients undergoing coronary angiogram over a year at tertiary hospital performed by experienced operators through radial or femoral access.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Hepatic artery infusion pump (HAIP) chemotherapy is a locoregional treatment for intrahepatic malignancies. HAIPs are surgically implanted, and the catheter tip is typically inserted into a ligated gastroduodenal artery stump. Potential complications at the catheter insertion site include dehiscence, pseudoaneurysm or extravasation, and adjacent hepatic arterial stenosis and thrombosis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Endovascular treatment (EVT) for patients with lower extremity artery disease is widely used as a less invasive alternative to surgical bypass. Recently, transradial artery intervention has gained popularity owing to its minimally invasive nature. The distance from the radial artery to the target vessel is critical for success; however, effective pre-assessment methods have not yet been established.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aims: This study aims to verify the feasibility and safety of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after a distal transradial approach (dTRA) with radial artery occlusion (RAO) recanalization.

Methods: Between July 2018 and January 2022, 30 patients underwent PCI following attempted RAO recanalization via dTRA. Among these cases, the target radial arteries could not be recanalized in five patients, necessitating alternative vascular access.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The abandonment rates of upper-limb (UL) prostheses are concerning and are related to limitations in the functional and kinematic aspects of the UL prosthesis. Evaluating the usability of prostheses is essential to make improvements in relation to these aspects and develop effective equipment and inform clinical results relevant to rehabilitation. The purpose of this scoping review is to explore the current state of the literature, the characteristics of studies on the topic, and the main parameters and instruments used to evaluate UL prosthesis, regarding kinematic and functional aspects.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!