This study examined whether restrained eaters are more critical of others' body weight than unrestrained eaters. Fifty-seven female undergraduates were shown photos of a female subject described as either 18-years old (peer) or 30-years old (non-peer); they then completed measures assessing direct and indirect weight criticalness. To measure direct criticalness, participants indicated the degree to which they felt each target was too thin or too heavy. To measure indirect criticalness, participants reported how much they thought each target weighed and how much she should ideally weigh; estimated weight was then subtracted from ideal weight. Findings revealed the restrained eaters were more indirectly critical of the peer target. Specifically, the restrained eaters thought the peer target should weigh 9.42 lbs less than her current weight, whereas the unrestrained eaters reported she should weigh 3.84 lbs less. Results suggest that restrained eaters are more critical of their peers' body weight than unrestrained eaters.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2011.01.003 | DOI Listing |
Front Psychol
June 2024
Faculty of Management, Bayes Business School, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Observed choices between options representing a relative vice and a relative virtue have commonly been used as a measure of eating self-control in the literature. However, even though self-control operations may manifest across the post-choice consumption stage, either similarly or in different ways from the choice stage, most prior research has ignored consumption quantity of the chosen option. While the behavior of choosing a virtue instead of a vice does manifest self-control, we examine how this plays out in post-choice consumption.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur Eat Disord Rev
January 2024
University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Objective: Restrained eaters (RE) show behaviourally unregulated food intake, which is often explained by a deficit in inhibitory control. Despite evidence for general inhibitory deficits in RE, it remains unclear how the variety of (food) cues in our environment can influence cognitive control.
Method: In this re-analysis, we explored the inhibitory capacity of RE and unrestrained eaters (URE) on a stop-signal task with modal (pictures) and amodal (word) food and non-food stimuli.
Appetite
May 2023
School of Psychology, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian, Liaonin, China. Electronic address:
Restrictive eating is the propensity to restrict food consumption to control body weight. Most previous studies have focused on reactive inhibition induced by external cessation signals. Individuals usually engage in intentional inhibition, an internal form of inhibitory control that arises spontaneously in the absence of an explicit external inhibitory signal.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBr J Psychol
May 2023
Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Behavior and Cognitive Neuroscience, School of Psychology, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China.
Food-related attentional bias refers that individuals typically prioritize rewarding food-related cues (e.g. food words and food images) compared with non-food stimuli; however, the findings are inconsistent for restrained eaters.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAtten Percept Psychophys
July 2023
Department of Psychology, Kadir Has University, Cibali Mah. Hisaralti Cad. No: 17, 34083, Istanbul, Turkey.
Our environment is surrounded by appetizing food stimuli that contribute to an increase in health problems such as obesity and overweight. Understanding the cognitive factors underlying the processing of food stimuli can play an important role in health interventions. Recent studies showed that high-calorie food stimuli impair working memory (WM) task performance, and some individuals, such as restrained eaters, are more susceptible to this WM performance decrement.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!