Thesauri that are "ontologized" into OWL-DL semantics are highly amenable to modeling errors resulting from falsely interpreting existential restrictions. We investigated the OWL-DL representation of the NCI Thesaurus (NCIT) in order to assess the correctness of existential restrictions. A random sample of 354 axioms using the someValuesFrom operator was taken. According to a rating performed by two domain experts, roughly half of these examples, and in consequence more than 76,000 axioms in the OWL-DL version, make incorrect assertions if interpreted according to description logics semantics. These axioms therefore constitute a huge source for unintended models, rendering most logic-based reasoning unreliable. After identifying typical error patterns we discuss some possible improvements. Our recommendation is to either amend the problematic axioms in the OWL-DL formalization or to consider some less strict representational format.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3041372PMC

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nci thesaurus
8
existential restrictions
8
axioms owl-dl
8
pitfalls thesaurus
4
thesaurus ontologization
4
ontologization case
4
case nci
4
thesaurus thesauri
4
thesauri "ontologized"
4
owl-dl
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!