A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

A novel technique for the management of advanced uterine/vault prolapse: extraperitoneal sacrocolpopexy. | LitMetric

Introduction And Hypothesis: Abdominal sacrocolpopexy is the gold standard for advanced uterovaginal/cuff prolapse repair; however, early and late bowel complications are of concern. We report our experience with extraperitoneal sacrocolpopexy (ESCP).

Methods: Twenty-three patients who underwent ESCP between 2007 and 2010 were analyzed in this retrospective cohort study. Preoperative assessment included Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) and Pelvic Floor Impact (PFIQ-7) questionnaires, and pelvic examination according to Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system. Pre-operative findings were compared with postoperative values at the last follow-up using the Wilcoxon sign test.

Results: Mean operation time was 86 ± 20 min. Twenty patients were discharged within 24 h. With a mean follow-up of 20 months, objective and subjective cure rates were 91.3% and 86.9%, respectively. No postoperative complications were evident with significant improvement in POP-Q, PFDI-20, and PFIQ-7 scores.

Conclusions: ESCP is a safe and effective sacrocolpopexy procedure that can potentially eliminate the risk of gastrointestinal complications.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-011-1378-3DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

extraperitoneal sacrocolpopexy
8
pelvic floor
8
novel technique
4
technique management
4
management advanced
4
advanced uterine/vault
4
uterine/vault prolapse
4
prolapse extraperitoneal
4
sacrocolpopexy
4
sacrocolpopexy introduction
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!