Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Objectives: This study was undertaken to assess independent no-reflow predictors in patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) and primary drug-eluting stenting in the current interventional strategies.
Design: One thousand four hundred and thirteen patients with STEMI were successfully treated with primary drug-eluting stenting within 12 h after AMI. All clinical, angiographic and procedural data were collected. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent no-reflow predictors.
Results: The no-reflow was found in 297 (21%) of 1413 patients. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression identified that age (>65 years, OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.46-1.49; p = 0.007), long time-to-reperfusion (>6 h, OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.16-1.40; p = 0.001), admission plasma glucose (>13.0 mmol/L, OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.16-1.40; p = 0.027), collateral circulation (0-1, OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.25-2.29; p = 0.001), pre-PCI thrombus score (≥4, OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.16-1.79; p = 0.011), and IABP use before PCI (OR 2.89, 95% CI 1.65-5.05; p < 0.0001) were independent no-reflow predictors. The no-reflow rate significantly increased as the number of independent predictors increased (0%, 6%, 15%, 25%, 40%, 50% and 100% in patients with 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 independent predictors, respectively; p < 0.0001).
Conclusions: The prediction model consisted of six no-reflow predictors in patients with STEMI and primary drug-eluting stenting and should be confirmed in large-scale prospective studies.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/14017431.2011.558209 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!