Comparing sexual assault prevalence estimates obtained with direct and indirect questioning techniques.

Violence Against Women

RTI International, 3040 Cornwallis Road, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA.

Published: February 2011

Concerns have been expressed about the validity of self-reported data on sexual assault, as victims might be reluctant to disclose what happened to them. In this study, using an anonymous, web-based survey, a sample of 5,446 undergraduate women were asked about their experiences with physically forced sexual assault using both direct and indirect questioning methods. The prevalence of physically forced sexual assault obtained via indirect questioning was slightly higher than, though not substantially or statistically different from, the estimate obtained via direct questioning. The results suggest that either direct questioning yields reasonably valid estimates of the prevalence of sexual assault or that the item count technique does not produce estimates that are any more valid.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077801210397743DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sexual assault
20
indirect questioning
12
direct indirect
8
physically forced
8
forced sexual
8
direct questioning
8
assault
5
questioning
5
comparing sexual
4
assault prevalence
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!