Amblyopia is characterised by visual deficits in both spatial vision and motion perception. While the spatial deficits are thought to result from deficient processing at both low and higher level stages of visual processing, the deficits in motion perception appear to result primarily from deficits involving higher level processing. Specifically, it has been argued that the motion deficit in amblyopia occurs when local motion information is pooled spatially and that this process is abnormally susceptible to the presence of noise elements in the stimulus. Here we investigated motion direction discrimination for abruptly presented two-frame Gabor stimuli in a group of five strabismic amblyopes and five control observers. Motion direction discrimination for this stimulus is inherently noisy and relies on the signal/noise processing of motion detectors. We varied viewing condition (monocular vs. binocular), stimulus size (5.3-18.5°) and stimulus contrast (high vs. low) in order to assess the effects of binocular summation, spatial summation and contrast on task performance. No differences were found for the high contrast stimuli; however the low contrast stimuli revealed differences between the control and amblyopic groups and between fellow fixing and amblyopic eyes. Control participants exhibited pronounced binocular summation for this task (on average a factor of 3.7), whereas amblyopes showed no such effect. In addition, the spatial summation that occurred for control eyes and the fellow eye of amblyopes was significantly attenuated for the amblyopic eyes relative to fellow eyes. Our results support the hypothesis that pooling of local motion information from amblyopic eyes is abnormal and highly sensitive to noise.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2011.02.001DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

binocular summation
12
motion direction
12
direction discrimination
12
amblyopic eyes
12
motion
9
motion perception
8
higher level
8
local motion
8
spatial summation
8
contrast stimuli
8

Similar Publications

Biofeedback rehabilitation in patients with binocular inhibition due to macular disease.

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol

January 2025

Donald K Johnson Eye Institute, Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.

Background: To investigate whether patients with binocular reading inhibition due to central vision loss benefit from a new biofeedback (BF) rehabilitation method that aimed at improving fixation stability and at establishing a correspondence between the monocular preferred retinal loci (PRLs) on functioning retina in both eyes.

Methods: Thirty-three patients with bilateral macular disease and with binocular reading inhibition participated in 10 training sessions consisting of 10-min visual stimulation for each eye to stabilize fixation and relocate the PRL (if needed) using the BF module of the MP-1 microperimeter (Nidek Technologies Srl., Vigonza, PD, Italy).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

What Factors Affect Binocular Summation?

Brain Sci

November 2024

School of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan 5290002, Israel.

Binocular vision may serve as a good model for research on awareness. Binocular summation (BS) can be defined as the superiority of binocular over monocular visual performance. Early studies of BS found an improvement of a factor of about 1.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

During locomotion, the visual system can factor out the motion component caused by observer locomotion from the complex target flow vector to obtain the world-relative target motion. This process, which has been termed flow parsing, is known to be incomplete, but viewing with both eyes could potentially aid in this task. Binocular disparity and binocular summation could both improve performance when viewing with both eyes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Importance: Individuals with mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) often report vision problems despite having normal visual acuity and fundus examinations. Diagnostics are needed for these patients.

Objective: To determine if a battery of assessments or machine-learning approaches can aid in diagnosing visual dysfunction in patients with mild TBI.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • - The study investigates how fixational eye movements (FEMs) vary among children, adolescents, and adults under different viewing conditions (binocular and monocular).
  • - A total of 68 healthy participants were divided into three age groups and assessed for various metrics including fixation stability and saccade characteristics using a high-resolution video tracker.
  • - Results show that younger children demonstrate more fixation instability and larger saccade amplitudes compared to adults, but factors like inter-ocular fixation stability remain consistent across age groups, suggesting their utility in diagnosing conditions like amblyopia.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!