Purpose: In clinical and retrieval analyses, over-penetration of cement, incomplete seating of the prosthesis with a resultant polar cement mass, or both, have been associated with early femoral failures of resurfacing arthroplasties. We used human bone specimens to experimentally compare the initial stability of different cementing techniques.

Methods: Twenty-six pairs of fresh frozen femora were prepared for resurfacing using original instruments (DePuy ASR). ASR femoral resurfacing prostheses were implanted using two different cementing techniques: (1) component filling and (2) cement applicator. Real-time measurements of pressure and temperature during implantation, analyses of cement penetration and micro motions under torque application were performed.

Results: Applicator use reduced significantly the cement penetration depth (9.2 mm vs 5.3 mm with the applicator, p = 0.001), polar mantle (8.1 mm vs 2.6 mm, p = 0.008), cement defects (3.7 mm vs 0.1 mm, p = 0.008) and interface temperatures (40.3°C vs 33.1°C, p < 0.001 ). Initial rotational stability showed statistically significant less extreme values with the cement applicator technique (range 3.4-51.7 m°/Nm, 11.0-29.7 m°/Nm, p = 0.024).

Conclusions: The cement applicator technique significantly reduces cement defects, incomplete seating, over-penetration and interface temperatures with a more consistent initial stability of the ASR femoral resurfacing prostheses.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3224607PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-011-1212-zDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

initial stability
12
cement applicator
12
cement
9
incomplete seating
8
asr femoral
8
femoral resurfacing
8
resurfacing prostheses
8
cement penetration
8
cement defects
8
interface temperatures
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!