Objectives: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare treatment effectiveness and adverse effects in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy with palonosetron to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV).

Methods: We identified randomized controlled clinical trials (RCT) comparing palonosetron with first-generation 5-HT3RA in the prevention of CINV in cancer patients. Meta-analyses were performed on homogeneous studies. Fixed or random-effects models were used to combine data.

Results: Eight eligible trials were identified, reporting outcomes on 3,592 patients. Meta-analyses showed statistically significant differences in favor of palonosetron compared with first-generation 5-HT3RA in prevention of acute CINV (p = .0003), delayed CINV (p < .00001), and overall phase of CINV (p < .00001). Subgroup analyses showed statistically significant differences in favor of both 0.25 mg and 0.75 mg of palonosetron in prevention of all phases of CINV. There were no statistically significant differences between 0.25 and 0.75 mg of palonosetron. Compared with the first-generation 5-HT3RA, 0.75 mg of palonosetron showed a statistically significant difference in the occurrence of constipation (p = .04).

Interpretation: The use of palonosetron should be considered an integral part of adjuvant therapy for prevention of the acute, delayed, and overall phases of CINV. The 0.25 mg intravenous palonosetron dose is as effective as the 0.75 mg intravenous palonosetron dose. However, 0.75 mg intravenous palonosetron causes constipation more frequently than the first-generation 5-HT3RA.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3228089PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2010-0198DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

intravenous palonosetron
16
first-generation 5-ht3ra
16
statistically differences
12
075 palonosetron
12
palonosetron
11
systematic review
8
review meta-analysis
8
palonosetron prevention
8
chemotherapy-induced nausea
8
nausea vomiting
8

Similar Publications

Randomized, Phase III Trial of Mixed Formulation of Fosrolapitant and Palonosetron (HR20013) in Preventing Cisplatin-Based Highly Emetogenic Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: PROFIT.

J Clin Oncol

December 2024

Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.

Purpose: Mixed formulation of fosrolapitant and palonosetron (PALO), HR20013, is a novel fixed-dose intravenous antiemetic combination that could simultaneously antagonize neurokinin-1 and 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptors. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HR20013 plus dexamethasone (DEX) versus fosaprepitant (FAPR) plus PALO + DEX for preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC).

Methods: This is a noninferiority study.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The most troublesome complaint after general anaesthesia and surgery, especially laparoscopic surgeries, is postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). We routinely use pharmacologic prophylaxis to prevent PONV. In patients undergoing laparoscopic procedures, we assessed the effectiveness of palonosetron compared to ondansetron combined with dexamethasone in preventing the incidence of PONV.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Spinal anesthesia is the preferred anesthetic technique for cesarean deliveries. Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and pruritus occur in up to 80% and 83% of patients, respectively, after cesarean delivery with intrathecal opioids. Ondansetron is the recommended medication for PONV prophylaxis, but palonosetron, a second-generation 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, has a higher receptor affinity and a longer half-life.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of intravenous palonosetron compared to ondansetron on hypotension induced by spinal anesthesia in women undergoing cesarean section.

Methods: Fifty-four women scheduled for elective cesarean section were, randomly allocated to ondansetron group (n = 27) or palonosetron group (n = 27). Ten minutes prior to the administration of spinal anesthesia, participants received an intravenous injection of either ondansetron or palonosetron.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • There is a lack of evidence regarding the emetogenicity (the ability to cause vomiting) of intravenous pegaspargase in pediatric patients, which prevented its classification in clinical guidelines.
  • A retrospective study reviewed records of 44 pediatric patients treated with IV pegaspargase from 2011 to 2020, focusing on those who did not vomit after treatment.
  • The findings showed that all 13 patients who received anti-nausea medications had a complete response, leading to the recommendation of classifying IV pegaspargase as moderately emetogenic.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!