A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Efficacy of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of middle ear cholesteatoma. | LitMetric

Objective: This study evaluated the usefulness of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) in the diagnosis of middle ear cholesteatoma.

Methods: We performed DWI on 73 patients suspected of having middle ear cholesteatoma, including 21 revision cases. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed with 1.5T units using diffusion-weighted spin-echo-type echo planar imaging (DWI).

Results: Of 73 subjects, 59 had cholesteatoma that consisted of 41 primary acquired cholesteatoma, 13 had residual and/or recurrent cholesteatoma, four had congenital cholesteatoma, and one had iatrogenic cholesteatoma. Positive DWI findings were observed in 42 subjects and negative findings in 31 subjects. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of DWI for cholesteatoma were 69.4%, 92.8%, 97.5%, and 41.9%, respectively. In the case of 34 patients who were positive for cholesteatoma on both otoscopic and CT examinations, 33 were diagnosed with cholesteatoma. Of the remaining 39 subjects with one or both negative results for cholesteatoma, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of DWI were 57.6%, 92.3%, 93.7%, and 52.1%, respectively. Cholesteatoma mass diameters were less than 5mm in 10 out of 18 subjects with both cholesteatoma and negative DWI findings. Of the 21 subjects who received revision surgery, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of DWI for residual or recurrent acquired cholesteatoma were 71.4%, 100%, 100%, and 63.6%, respectively.

Conclusions: Since DWI clearly showed high specificity and positive predictive value, it is useful for diagnosing middle ear cholesteatoma, including postoperative recurrent cholesteatoma of 5mm diameter or larger. DWI could sufficiently detect cholesteatoma with one or both negative results on otoscopic and CT examinations, but it was difficult to detect cholesteatoma of less than 5mm diameter using DWI owing to the tiny mass and small volume of debris.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anl.2010.11.004DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cholesteatoma
18
middle ear
16
specificity positive
16
magnetic resonance
12
resonance imaging
12
ear cholesteatoma
12
sensitivity specificity
12
negative predictive
12
dwi
10
diffusion-weighted magnetic
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!