How to identify patients with cancer at risk of falling: a review of the evidence.

J Palliat Med

Department of Education & Research, Our Lady's Hospice and Care Services, Dublin, Ireland.

Published: February 2011

Background: Clinical experience and a limited number of studies suggest that a cancer diagnosis confers a high risk of accidental falls. The negative sequelae of falls in older persons are well documented; risk factors for falls in this population have been extensively investigated and evidence for the efficacy of interventions to reduce falls is steadily emerging. It is not known whether the risk factors for falls and effective interventions for falls risk reduction in patients with cancer are different from those in older persons.

Methods: Electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL were searched for studies of risk factors for falls or effective interventions for falls risk reduction in patients with cancer. Assessment of study quality was performed. Data analysis was descriptive.

Results: Seven studies designed to identify the risk factors for falls in patients with cancer and one study to determine the predictive validity of a screening tool for falls in patients with cancer were included. All had methodological shortcomings, precluding the generation of a new synthesis from this review, but highlighting important design and statistical issues.

Conclusions: Further research is needed to identify patients at risk and inform the design of an interventional model to reduce falls risk. Investigators should be cognizant of the limitations of using cross-sectional study design to answer this research question, should employ validated tools to measure exposure variables, use reliable methods to ascertain the occurrence of falls and appropriate statistical models to adjust for confounding variables.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2010.0326DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patients cancer
20
risk factors
16
factors falls
16
falls
12
falls risk
12
risk
10
identify patients
8
reduce falls
8
falls effective
8
effective interventions
8

Similar Publications

Prospective validation study of a combined urine and plasma test for predicting high-grade prostate cancer in biopsy naïve men.

Scand J Urol

January 2025

Department of Urology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Academy of Geriatric Cancer Research (AgeCare), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

Objective: Early and accurate diagnosis of prostate cancer (PC) is crucial for effective treatment. Diagnosing  clinically insignificant cancers can lead to overdiagnosis and overtreatment, highlighting the importance of accurately selecting patients for further evaluation based on improved risk prediction tools. Novel biomarkers offer promise for enhancing this diagnostic process.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Low-grade gliomas and reactive piloid gliosis can present with overlapping features on conventional histology. Given the large implications for patient treatment, there is a need for effective methods to discriminate these morphologically similar but clinically distinct entities. Using routinely available stains, we hypothesize that a limited panel including SOX10, p16, and cyclin D1 may be useful in differentiating mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase-activated low-grade gliomas from piloid gliosis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most common subtype of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Due to the lack of symptoms until advanced stages, early diagnosis of ccRCC is challenging. Therefore, the identification of novel secreted biomarkers for the early detection of ccRCC is urgently needed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Deficient Mismatch Repair and BRAF Mutations in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in the South Island of New Zealand.

Asia Pac J Clin Oncol

January 2025

Wellington Blood and Cancer Centre, Health New Zealand/Te Whatu Ora - Capital, Coast and Hutt Valley, Wellington, New Zealand.

Aim: Manatū Hauora, the Ministry of Health of New Zealand (NZ), published minimum standards for molecular testing of colorectal cancers (CRCs) in June 2018. These included mismatch repair (MMR) testing at diagnosis and BRAFV600E mutation analysis on newly diagnosed stage IV CRCs. This study aimed to determine the proportion of patients with CRC in the South Island of NZ with metastatic deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) CRC, the proportion of metastatic CRCs and dMMR CRCs that have a BRAFV600E mutation, and audit testing for BRAF mutations and appropriate referral to genetics services.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: This study investigated the association between loss of MSH2/MSH6 versus loss of MLH1/PMS2 expression and overall survival and disease-free survival in patients with localized colorectal cancer.

Background: The risk of developing colorectal cancer varies depending on the expression of mismatch repair proteins. However, it is unknown if the prognosis differs accordingly.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!